Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22305233›Full record

ReviewTrends in plant science2012

Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions.

Matthias Erb, Stefan Meldau, Gregg A Howe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in plant science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 357 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
357citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

357 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Plant strategies against herbivorous insects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

297 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias ErbRoot-Herbivore Interactions Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany. merb@ice.mpg.de
Stefan Meldau
Gregg A Howe

Funding

REGULATION OF DEFENSE SIGNALING IN TOMATOR01GM057795 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, GREGG A · 1998 to 2012
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057795NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM57795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity to perceive and respond is integral to biological immune systems, but to what extent can plants specifically recognize and respond to insects? Recent findings suggest that plants possess surveillance systems that are able to detect general patterns of cellular damage as well as highly specific herbivore-associated cues. The jasmonate (JA) pathway has emerged as the major signaling cassette that integrates information perceived at the plant-insect interface into broad-spectrum defense responses. Specificity can be achieved via JA-independent processes and spatio-temporal changes of JA-modulating hormones, including ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, cytokinins (CK), brassinosteroids (BR) and gibberellins (GB). The identification of receptors and ligands and an integrative view of hormone-mediated response systems are crucial to understand specificity in plant immunity to herbivores.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsHost SpecificityInsectaModels, BiologicalPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlantsPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID22305233
PMCPMC3346861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.