SynthesisBMC family practice2012
Predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment: A Meta-analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Liver disease in management and outcomes of European and Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from two observational prospective registries.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Observational
- Estimating real-world treatment effects in the presence of measurement error and sparse outcome data using propensity score methods.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Trend of Oral Anticoagulation Use in Postoperative and Nonpostoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Routine Clinical Practice.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Country and health expenditure are major predictors of withholding anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of stroke.Open heart · 2023Article
- Time trends in antithrombotic therapy prescription patterns: Real-world monocentric study in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation.World journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2021Article
- The role of biomarkers and neuroimaging in ischemic/hemorrhagic risk assessment for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease prevention.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2021Article
- Frailty, Cognitive Impairment, and Anticoagulation Among Older Adults with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
- Influence of Age on Warfarin Dose, Anticoagulation Control, and Risk of Hemorrhage.Pharmacotherapy · 2018Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Observational
- Incidence and characteristics of major bleeding among rivaroxaban users with renal disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Atrial Fibrillation for the Neurologist: Preventing both Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018Review
- Article
- The role of contraindications in prescribing anticoagulants to patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional analysis of primary care data in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Patient preferences regarding atrial fibrillation stroke prophylaxis in patients at potential risk of atrial fibrillation.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2017Review
- Trends in the prevalence and management of pre-stroke atrial fibrillation, the South London Stroke Register, 1995-2014.PloS one · 2017Article
- No Decline in the Risk of Stroke Following Incident Atrial Fibrillation Since 2000 in the Community: A Concerning Trend.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- Long-term vitamin K antagonists treatment patterns of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF): a population-based cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite warfarin's marked efficacy, not all eligible patients receive it for stroke prevention in AF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between prescriber and/or patient characteristics and subsequent prescription of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
methodsObservational studies conducted in the US using multivariate analysis to determine the relationship between characteristics and the odds of receiving warfarin for stroke prevention were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE and a manual review of references. Effect estimates of prescriber and/or patient characteristics from individual studies were pooled to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsTwenty-eight studies reporting results of 33 unique multivariate analyses were identified. Warfarin use across studies ranged from 9.1%-79.8% (median=49.1%). There was a moderately-strong correlation between warfarin use and year of study (r=0.60, p=0.002). Upon meta-analysis, characteristics associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of warfarin use included history of cerebrovascular accident (OR=1.59), heart failure (OR=1.36), and male gender (OR=1.12). Those associated with a significant reduction in the odds of warfarin use included alcohol/drug abuse (OR=0.62), perceived barriers to compliance (OR=0.87), contraindication(s) to warfarin (OR=0.81), dementia (OR=0.32), falls (OR=0.60), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR=0.47), intracranial hemorrhage (OR=0.39), hepatic (OR=0.59), and renal impairment (OR=0.69). While age per 10-year increase (OR=0.78) and advancing age as a dichotomized variable (cut-off varied by study) (OR=0.57) were associated with significant reductions in warfarin use; qualitative review of results of studies evaluating age as a categorical variable did not confirm this relationship.
conclusionsWarfarin use has increased somewhat over time. The decision to prescribe warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is based upon multiple prescriber and patient characteristics. These findings can be used by family practice prescribers and other healthcare decision-makers to target interventions or methods to improve utilization of warfarin when it is indicated for stroke prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.