Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22304499›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2012

Amsacrine as a topoisomerase II poison: importance of drug-DNA interactions.

Adam C Ketron, William A Denny, David E Graves, Neil Osheroff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DNA topoisomerases as molecular targets for anticancer drugs.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  20. The GeneG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam C KetronDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146, United States.
William A Denny
David E Graves
Neil Osheroff
Cancer Society of New Zealand · NZUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Training GrantT32GM065086 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, SULIKOWSKI, GARY ALLEN · 2002 to 2022
$7.0M
FUNCTION AND BIOLOGY OF EUKARYOTIC DNA TOPOISOMERASESR01GM033944 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI OSHEROFF, NEIL · 1985 to 2015
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM33944NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033944NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amsacrine (m-AMSA) is an anticancer agent that displays activity against refractory acute leukemias as well as Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The drug is comprised of an intercalative acridine moiety coupled to a 4'-amino-methanesulfon-m-anisidide headgroup. m-AMSA is historically significant in that it was the first drug demonstrated to function as a topoisomerase II poison. Although m-AMSA was designed as a DNA binding agent, the ability to intercalate does not appear to be the sole determinant of drug activity. Therefore, to more fully analyze structure-function relationships and the role of DNA binding in the action of m-AMSA, we analyzed a series of derivatives for the ability to enhance DNA cleavage mediated by human topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ and to intercalate DNA. Results indicate that the 3'-methoxy (m-AMSA) positively affects drug function, potentially by restricting the rotation of the headgroup in a favorable orientation. Shifting the methoxy to the 2'-position (o-AMSA), which abrogates drug function, appears to increase the degree of rotational freedom of the headgroup and may impair interactions of the 1'-substituent or other portions of the headgroup within the ternary complex. Finally, the nonintercalative m-AMSA headgroup enhanced enzyme-mediated DNA cleavage when it was detached from the acridine moiety, albeit with 100-fold lower affinity. Taken together, our results suggest that much of the activity and specificity of m-AMSA as a topoisomerase II poison is embodied in the headgroup, while DNA intercalation is used primarily to increase the affinity of m-AMSA for the topoisomerase II-DNA cleavage complex.

Indexed as

AmsacrineAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA CleavageDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHumansIntercalating AgentsKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationStructure-Activity RelationshipTopoisomerase II InhibitorsAmsacrineAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIIntercalating AgentsTopoisomerase II Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22304499
PMCPMC3289736
OpenAlexW2012703293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.