Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22303437›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Defining Plasmodium falciparum treatment in South West Asia: a randomized trial comparing artesunate or primaquine combined with chloroquine or SP.

Kate Kolaczinski, Toby Leslie, Iftikhar Ali, Naeem Durrani, Sue Lee, Marion Barends, Khalid Beshir, Rosalynn Ord, Rachel Hallett, Mark Rowland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00959517 (Pseudo-randomised, Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Trial of Chloroquine or Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine Alone or in Combination With Primaquine or Artesunate for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00959517 phase2completednot on this map

Pseudo-randomised, Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Trial of Chloroquine or Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine Alone or in Combination With Primaquine or Artesunate for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2001 to 2006Enrolled588ConditionsUncomplicated Falciparum MalariaArmsartesunate (AS), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), Chloroquine (CQ), primaquine (PQ)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Efficacy of Different Primaquine Regimens to ControlThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  7. Epidemiology and Control of Plasmodium vivax in Afghanistan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate KolaczinskiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. k.kolaczinski@gmail.com
Toby Leslie
Iftikhar Ali
Naeem Durrani
Sue Lee
Marion Barends
Khalid Beshir
Rosalynn Ord
Rachel Hallett
Mark Rowland
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMahidol University · THShoklo Malaria Research Unit · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimalarial resistance has led to a global policy of artemisinin-based combination therapy. Despite growing resistance chloroquine (CQ) remained until recently the official first-line treatment for falciparum malaria in Pakistan, with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) second-line. Co-treatment with the gametocytocidal primaquine (PQ) is recommended for transmission control in South Asia. The relative effect of artesunate (AS) or primaquine, as partner drugs, on clinical outcomes and gametocyte carriage in this setting were unknown.

methodsA single-blinded, randomized trial among Afghan refugees in Pakistan compared six treatment arms: CQ; CQ+(single-dose)PQ; CQ+(3 d)AS; SP; SP+(single-dose)PQ, and SP+(3 d)AS. The objectives were to compare treatment failure rates and effect on gametocyte carriage, of CQ or SP monotherapy against the respective combinations (PQ or AS). Outcomes included trophozoite and gametocyte clearance (read by light microscopy), and clinical and parasitological failure.

findingsA total of 308 (87%) patients completed the trial. Failure rates by day 28 were: CQ 55/68 (81%); CQ+AS 19/67 (28%), SP 4/41 (9.8%), SP+AS 1/41 (2.4%). The addition of PQ to CQ or SP did not affect failure rates (CQ+PQ 49/67 (73%) failed; SP+PQ 5/33 (16%) failed). AS was superior to PQ at clearing gametocytes; gametocytes were seen on d7 in 85% of CQ, 40% of CQ+PQ, 21% of CQ+AS, 91% of SP, 76% of SP+PQ and 23% of SP+AS treated patients. PQ was more effective at clearing older gametocyte infections whereas AS was more effective at preventing emergence of mature gametocytes, except in cases that recrudesced.

conclusionsCQ is no longer appropriate by itself or in combination. These findings influenced the replacement of CQ with SP+AS for first-line treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. The threat of SP resistance remains as SP monotherapy is still common. Three day AS was superior to single-dose PQ for reducing gametocyte carriage.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00959517.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateChildChloroquineDrug CombinationsDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalaria, FalciparumMalePakistanAntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateChloroquineDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPrimaquinePyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID22303437
PMCPMC3269419
OpenAlexW2053416234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.