Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22303321›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2011

Systematic Curation of miRBase Annotation Using Integrated Small RNA High-Throughput Sequencing Data for C. elegans and Drosophila.

Xiangfeng Wang, X Shirley Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barley Seeds miRNome Stability during Long-Term Storage and Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. In Silico Analysis of Micro-RNA Sequencing Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function.Nucleic acids research · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangfeng WangSchool of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.
X Shirley Liu
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Identification of DNA Elements Governing Chromatin Function in C elegansU01HG004270 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIEB, JASON D · 2007 to 2011
$9.7M
A Data Analysis Center for integration of fly and worm modENCODE datasetsRC2HG005639 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2009 to 2011
$4.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005639NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of 20-23 nucleotide small RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in animals and plants. Annotation of miRNAs by the miRNA database (miRBase) has largely relied on computational approaches. As a result, many miRBase entries lack experimental validation, and discrepancies between miRBase annotation and actual miRNA sequences are often observed. In this study, we integrated the small RNA sequencing (smRNA-seq) datasets in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and devised an analytical pipeline coupled with detailed manual inspection to curate miRNA annotation systematically in miRBase. Our analysis reveals 19 (17.0%) and 51 (31.3%) miRNAs entries with detectable smRNA-seq reads have mature sequence discrepancies in C. elegans and D. melanogaster, respectively. These discrepancies frequently occur either for conserved miRNA families whose mature sequences were predicted according to their homologous counterparts in other species or for miRNAs whose precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) hairpins produce an abundance of multiple miRNA isoforms or variants. Our analysis shows that while Drosophila pre-miRNAs, on average, produce less than 60% accurate mature miRNA reads in addition to their 5' and 3' variant isoforms, the precision of miRNA processing in C. elegans is much higher, at over 90%. Based on the revised miRNA sequences, we analyzed expression patterns of the more conserved (MC) and less conserved (LC) miRNAs and found that, whereas MC miRNAs are often co-expressed at multiple developmental stages, LC miRNAs tend to be expressed specifically at fewer stages.

Indexed as

database curationdeep sequencingmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID22303321
PMCPMC3268580
OpenAlexW2164286670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.