Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22303282›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2012

Pulsed feedback defers cellular differentiation.

Joe H Levine, Michelle E Fontes, Jonathan Dworkin, Michael B Elowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Feedback-mediated signal conversion promotes viral fitness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. What does time mean in development?Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joe H LevineHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Biology and Department of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Michelle E Fontes
Jonathan Dworkin
Michael B Elowitz

Funding

Stochastic Pulsing in Microbial Regulation and DifferentiationR01GM079771 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ELOWITZ, MICHAEL B · 2007 to 2015
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079771NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental signals induce diverse cellular differentiation programs. In certain systems, cells defer differentiation for extended time periods after the signal appears, proliferating through multiple rounds of cell division before committing to a new fate. How can cells set a deferral time much longer than the cell cycle? Here we study Bacillus subtilis cells that respond to sudden nutrient limitation with multiple rounds of growth and division before differentiating into spores. A well-characterized genetic circuit controls the concentration and phosphorylation of the master regulator Spo0A, which rises to a critical concentration to initiate sporulation. However, it remains unclear how this circuit enables cells to defer sporulation for multiple cell cycles. Using quantitative time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of Spo0A dynamics in individual cells, we observed pulses of Spo0A phosphorylation at a characteristic cell cycle phase. Pulse amplitudes grew systematically and cell-autonomously over multiple cell cycles leading up to sporulation. This pulse growth required a key positive feedback loop involving the sporulation kinases, without which the deferral of sporulation became ultrasensitive to kinase expression. Thus, deferral is controlled by a pulsed positive feedback loop in which kinase expression is activated by pulses of Spo0A phosphorylation. This pulsed positive feedback architecture provides a more robust mechanism for setting deferral times than constitutive kinase expression. Finally, using mathematical modeling, we show how pulsing and time delays together enable "polyphasic" positive feedback, in which different parts of a feedback loop are active at different times. Polyphasic feedback can enable more accurate tuning of long deferral times. Together, these results suggest that Bacillus subtilis uses a pulsed positive feedback loop to implement a "timer" that operates over timescales much longer than a cell cycle.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsCell CycleCell ProliferationChronobiology PhenomenaComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, ReporterLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein KinasesSpores, BacterialBacterial ProteinskinA protein, Bacillus subtilisLuminescent ProteinsProtein Kinasesyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID22303282
PMCPMC3269414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.