ArticlePLoS biology2012
Pulsed feedback defers cellular differentiation.
Article in PLoS biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optogenetic control of cAMP oscillations reveals frequency-selective transcription factor dynamics in Dictyostelium.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Importance of ultradian oscillations in neurogenesis during development and its implications for spinal cord regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Synthetic gene circuit evolution: Insights and opportunities at the mid-scale.Cell chemical biology · 2024Review
- Regulation by cyclic di-GMP attenuates dynamics and enhances robustness of bimodal curli gene activation in Escherichia coli.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Navigating Environmental Transitions: the Role of Phenotypic Variation in Bacterial Responses.mBio · 2022Review
- Single cell variability of CRISPR-Cas interference and adaptation.Molecular systems biology · 2022Article
- Temporal signaling, population control, and information processing through chromatin-mediated gene regulation.Journal of theoretical biology · 2022Article
- A tunable population timer in multicellular consortia.iScience · 2021Article
- Experimental evidence for constraints in amplitude-timescale co-variation of a biomolecular pulse generating circuit design.IET systems biology · 2020Article
- Functional roles of microbial cell-to-cell heterogeneity and emerging technologies for analysis and control.Current opinion in microbiology · 2020Review
- Stochastic pulsing of gene expression enables the generation of spatial patterns in Bacillus subtilis biofilms.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Stochastic transcriptional pulses orchestrate flagellar biosynthesis inScience advances · 2020Article
- Optogenetic control of Bacillus subtilis gene expression.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Review
- A Bridge of Light: Toward Chinese and Western Medicine Perspectives Through Ultraweak Photon Emissions.Global advances in health and medicine · 2019Article
- Feedback-mediated signal conversion promotes viral fitness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Overcoming the Cost of Positive Autoregulation by Accelerating the Response with a Coupled Negative Feedback.Cell reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Lineage marker synchrony in hematopoietic genealogies refutes the PU.1/GATA1 toggle switch paradigm.Nature communications · 2018Article
- What does time mean in development?Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental signals induce diverse cellular differentiation programs. In certain systems, cells defer differentiation for extended time periods after the signal appears, proliferating through multiple rounds of cell division before committing to a new fate. How can cells set a deferral time much longer than the cell cycle? Here we study Bacillus subtilis cells that respond to sudden nutrient limitation with multiple rounds of growth and division before differentiating into spores. A well-characterized genetic circuit controls the concentration and phosphorylation of the master regulator Spo0A, which rises to a critical concentration to initiate sporulation. However, it remains unclear how this circuit enables cells to defer sporulation for multiple cell cycles. Using quantitative time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of Spo0A dynamics in individual cells, we observed pulses of Spo0A phosphorylation at a characteristic cell cycle phase. Pulse amplitudes grew systematically and cell-autonomously over multiple cell cycles leading up to sporulation. This pulse growth required a key positive feedback loop involving the sporulation kinases, without which the deferral of sporulation became ultrasensitive to kinase expression. Thus, deferral is controlled by a pulsed positive feedback loop in which kinase expression is activated by pulses of Spo0A phosphorylation. This pulsed positive feedback architecture provides a more robust mechanism for setting deferral times than constitutive kinase expression. Finally, using mathematical modeling, we show how pulsing and time delays together enable "polyphasic" positive feedback, in which different parts of a feedback loop are active at different times. Polyphasic feedback can enable more accurate tuning of long deferral times. Together, these results suggest that Bacillus subtilis uses a pulsed positive feedback loop to implement a "timer" that operates over timescales much longer than a cell cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.