Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22302780›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial.

Christopher C Butler, Sharon A Simpson, Frank Dunstan, Stephen Rollnick, David Cohen, David Gillespie, Meirion R Evans, M Fasihul Alam, Marie-Jet Bekkers, John Evans and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03674775 (Dialogue Around Respiratory Illness Treatment for Family Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03674775 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Dialogue Around Respiratory Illness Treatment for Family Practice (DART -FP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeattle Children's HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsAcute Respiratory Tract InfectionArmsDART QI Program Participation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. E-learning for health professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Common harms from amoxicillin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials for any indication.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Reducing antibiotic prescribing for children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christopher C ButlerInstitute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. butlercc@cf.ac.uk
Sharon A Simpson
Frank Dunstan
Stephen Rollnick
David Cohen
David Gillespie
Meirion R Evans
M Fasihul Alam
Marie-Jet Bekkers
John Evans
Laurence Moore
Robin Howe
Jamie Hayes
Monika Hare
Kerenza Hood

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and costs of a multifaceted flexible educational programme aimed at reducing antibiotic dispensing at the practice level in primary care.

designRandomised controlled trial with general practices as the unit of randomisation and analysis. Clinicians and researchers were blinded to group allocation until after randomisation.

setting68 general practices with about 480,000 patients in Wales, United Kingdom.

participants34 practices were randomised to receive the educational programme and 34 practices to be controls. 139 clinicians from the intervention practices and 124 from control practices had agreed to participate before randomisation. Practice level data covering all the clinicians in the 68 practices were analysed.

interventionsIntervention practices followed the Stemming the Tide of Antibiotic Resistance (STAR) educational programme, which included a practice based seminar reflecting on the practices' own dispensing and resistance data, online educational elements, and practising consulting skills in routine care. Control practices provided usual care.

main outcome measuresTotal numbers of oral antibiotic items dispensed for all causes per 1000 practice patients in the year after the intervention, adjusted for the previous year's dispensing. Secondary outcomes included reconsultations, admissions to hospital for selected causes, and costs.

resultsThe rate of oral antibiotic dispensing (items per 1000 registered patients) decreased by 14.1 in the intervention group but increased by 12.1 in the control group, a net difference of 26.1. After adjustment for baseline dispensing rate, this amounted to a 4.2% (95% confidence interval 0.6% to 7.7%) reduction in total oral antibiotic dispensing for the year in the intervention group relative to the control group (P=0.02). Reductions were found for all classes of antibiotics other than penicillinase-resistant penicillins but were largest and significant individually for phenoxymethylpenicillins (penicillin V) (7.3%, 0.4% to 13.7%) and macrolides (7.7%, 1.1% to 13.8%). There were no significant differences between intervention and control practices in the number of admissions to hospital or in reconsultations for a respiratory tract infection within seven days of an index consultation. The mean cost of the programme was £2923 (€3491, $4572) per practice (SD £1187). There was a 5.5% reduction in the cost of dispensed antibiotics in the intervention group compared with the control group (-0.4% to 11.4%), equivalent to a reduction of about £830 a year for an average intervention practice.

conclusionThe STAR educational programme led to reductions in all cause oral antibiotic dispensing over the subsequent year with no significant change in admissions to hospital, reconsultations, or costs. Trial registration ISRCT No 63355948.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareWalesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22302780
PMCPMC3270575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.