ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2012
Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Pooled it
- Test-takers' perspectives on consumer genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Review
- Genetics in the 21st Century: Implications for patients, consumers and citizens.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.Journal of surgical oncology · 2015Review
- Genetic counseling in direct-to-consumer exome sequencing: a case report.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Assessing the integration of genomic medicine in genetic counseling training programs.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- 'Battling my biology': psychological effects of genetic testing for risk of weight gain.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.Genome medicine · 2014Article
- Comparison of commercial genetic-testing services in Korea with 23andMe service.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.Current genetic medicine reports · 2013Article
- Implementation of a clinical research pharmacogenomics program at an academic medical center: role of the genetics healthcare professional.Pharmacogenomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technological advances and information-seeking consumers have pushed forward the movement of direct-to consumer(DTC) genetic testing. Just like with other types of testing, there are potential risks, benefits and limitations. A major limitation of DTC testing is the incomplete view it provides regarding lifetime risk for common, complex diseases,since most tests only analyze 1–2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and do not include evaluation of medical or family histories, which is necessary to risk assessment. Further, it is not currently well-established whether personal genomic testing results will lead toward improved health behaviors, adverse psychological effects or potential overuse of the health care system. To display these and other issues, we present an in-depth case study of an individual who ordered DTC genetic testing and subsequently sought genetic counseling. This case presents a unique learning experience for the field of genomic counseling, as the patient did not fit the typical assumptions regarding ‘early adopters’ of DTC testing. It also allowed the genetics health care providers involved in the case to identify gaps in current genetic counseling practice that need to be filled and approaches to employ for successful delivery of genomic counseling. Based on our experience, we developed practical recommendations for genomic counseling, which include novel approaches to case preparation, use of electronic tools during the counseling session, and focusing on education as the major component of the genomic counseling session, in order to provide patients with the knowledge necessary to independently interpret and understand large amounts of genomic testing information provided to them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.