ArticleStatistics in medicine2012
A nonparametric test for equality of survival medians.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nonparametric test for equality of survival medians using right-censored prevalent cohort survival data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- Nonparametric estimation of median survival times with applications to multi-site or multi-center studies.PloS one · 2018Observational
- Comparing survival curves based on medians.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Article
- Pseudo-value approach for comparing survival medians for dependent data.Statistics in medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical trials, researchers often encounter testing for equality of survival medians across study arms based on censored data. Even though Brookmeyer and Crowley introduced a method for comparing medians of several survival distributions, still some researchers misuse procedures that are designed for testing the homogeneity of survival curves. These procedures include the log-rank, Wilcoxon, and Cox models. This practice leads to inflation of the probability of a type I error, particularly when the underlying assumptions of these procedures are not met. We propose a new nonparametric method for testing the equality of several survival medians based on the Kaplan-Meier estimation from randomly right-censored data. We derive asymptotic properties of this test statistic. Through simulations, we compute and compare the empirical probabilities of type I errors and the power of this new procedure with those of the Brookmeyer-Crowley, log-rank, and Wilcoxon methods. Our simulation results indicate that the performance of these test procedures depends on the level of censoring and appropriateness of the underlying assumptions. When the objective is to test homogeneity of survival medians rather than survival curves and the assumptions of these tests are not met, some of these procedures severely inflate the probability of a type I error. In these situations, our test statistic provides an alternative to the Brookmeyer-Crowley test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.