ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2012
Have genomic discoveries in inflammatory bowel disease translated into clinical progress?
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of susceptibility variants at FCGR2A and 13q12 to the risk of relapse among Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel diseases: current status and proteomics identification strategies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a heterogeneous disease that can be challenging to diagnose and manage. As a result, significant efforts have been made in attempting to identify clinical, genomic, and serologic markers of disease that can aid in patient assessment and treatment. Recent genomic discoveries have the potential to change clinical practice by identifying those susceptible to IBD, predict natural history and guide choice of therapy. Panels of genetic and genomic markers are more likely to emerge as clinical tools, as opposed to individual allelic variants. Serology and biomarkers are already being used and guiding management but await integration with genomic panels before achieving their maximal potential. This article reviews the current state of IBD genetics and evolving molecular approaches that may have potential clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22302508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.