Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22302354›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2012

Factors affecting clinician educator encouragement of routine HIV testing among trainees.

Gail V Berkenblit, James M Sosman, Michael Bass, Hirut T Gebrekristos, Joseph Cofrancesco, Lynn E Sullivan, Robert L Cook, Marcia Edison, Philip G Bashook, P Todd Korthuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An overview of recent evidence on barriers and facilitators to HIV testing.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gail V BerkenblitDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. gberken@jhmi.edu
James M Sosman
Michael Bass
Hirut T Gebrekristos
Joseph Cofrancesco
Lynn E Sullivan
Robert L Cook
Marcia Edison
Philip G Bashook
P Todd Korthuis

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
Quality Outcomes for Patients with Drug Abuse and HIVK23DA019809 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KORTHUIS, PHILIP TODD · 2007 to 2011
$892k
SGIM Project: HIV Prevention with National Medical AssociationsU22PS000551 · PS · SOCIETY OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE · PI SOSMAN, JAMES · 2006 to 2008
$836k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCHHSTP CDC HHS 1 U22 PS00551-02NCHHSTP CDC HHS U22 PS000551NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA019809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdoption of CDC recommendations for routine, voluntary HIV screening of all Americans age 13–64 years has been slow. One method to increase adherence to clinical practice guidelines is through medical school and residency training.

objectiveTo explore the attitudes, barriers, and behaviors of clinician educators (CEs) regarding advocating routine HIV testing to their trainees. DESIGN/

participantsWe analyzed CE responses to a 2009 survey of Society of General Internal Medicine members from community, VA, and university-affiliated clinics regarding HIV testing practices. MAIN MEASURES: Clinician educators were asked about their outpatient practices, knowledge and attitudes regarding the revised CDC recommendations and whether they encouraged trainees to perform routine HIV testing. Associations between HIV testing knowledge and attitudes and encouraging trainees to perform routine HIV testing were estimated using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 515 respondents, 367 (71.3%) indicated they supervised trainees in an outpatient general internal medicine clinic. These CEs demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of CDC guidelines and over a third reported continued risk-based testing. Among CEs, 196 (53.4%) reported that they encourage trainees to perform routine HIV testing. Higher knowledge scores (aOR 5.10 (2.16, 12.0)) and more positive attitudes toward testing (aOR 8.83 (4.21, 18.5)) were independently associated with encouraging trainees to screen for HIV. Reasons for not encouraging trainees to screen included perceived low local prevalence (37.2%), competing teaching priorities (34.6%), and a busy clinic environment (34.0%).

conclusionsClinician educators have a special role in the dissemination of the CDC recommendations as they impact the knowledge and attitudes of newly practicing physicians. Despite awareness of CDC recommendations, many CEs do not recommend universal HIV testing to trainees. Interventions that improve faculty knowledge of HIV testing recommendations and address barriers in resident clinics may enhance adoption of routine HIV testing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisAmbulatory Care FacilitiesClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyMaleMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID22302354
PMCPMC3378731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.