Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22302314›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2012

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells: in quest of clinical applications.

Rosalinda Madonna

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Progress in Bioengineering Strategies for Heart Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosalinda MadonnaInstitute of Cardiology, G. d'Annunzio University-Chieti, C/o Ospedale SS. Annunziata Via dei Vestini, 66013 Chieti, Italy. rmadonna@heart.thi.tmc.edu
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of regenerative medicine, the development of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells may represent a potential strategy to overcome the limitations of human embryonic stem cells (ESCs). iPS cells have the potential to mimic human disease, since they carry the genome of the donor. Hypothetically, with iPS cell technology it is possible to screen patients for a genetic cause of disease (genetic mutation), develop cell lines, reprogram them back to iPS cells, finally differentiate them into one or more cell types that develop the disease. Although the creation of multiple lineages with iPS cells can seem limitless, a number of challenges need to be addressed in order to effectively use these cell lines for disease modeling. These include the low efficiency of iPS cell generation without genetic alterations, the possibility of tumor formation in vivo, the random integration of retroviral-based delivery vectors into the genome, and unregulated growth of the remaining cells that are partially reprogrammed and refractory to differentiation. The establishment of protein or RNA-based reprogramming strategies will help generate human iPS cells without permanent genetic alterations. Finally, direct reprogramming strategies can provide rapid production of models of human "diseases in a dish", without first passing the cells through a pluripotent state, so avoiding the challenges of time-consumming and labor-intensive iPS cell line generation. This review will overview methods to develop iPS cells, current strategies for direct reprogramming, and main applications of iPS cells as human disease model, focusing on human cardiovascular diseases, with the aim to be a potential information resource for biomedical scientists and clinicians who exploit or intend to exploit iPS cell technology in a range of applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesCell DifferentiationFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMiceMyocytes, CardiacRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID22302314
OpenAlexW2041909681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.