ReviewMolecular biotechnology2012
Human-induced pluripotent stem cells: in quest of clinical applications.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart: position paper for Cardiovascular Research: tissue engineering strategies combined with cell therapies for cardiac repair in ischaemic heart disease and heart failure.Cardiovascular research · 2019Guideline
- Progress in Bioengineering Strategies for Heart Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Next generation of heart regenerative therapies: progress and promise of cardiac tissue engineering.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Composite Nanoscaffolds Modified with Bio-ceramic Nanoparticles (Zn2SiO4) Prompted Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2019Article
- A Myogenic Double-Reporter Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Line Allows Prospective Isolation of Skeletal Muscle Progenitors.Cell reports · 2018Article
- Freezing Responses in DMSO-Based Cryopreservation of Human iPS Cells: Aggregates Versus Single Cells.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2018Article
- Phenotypic screening with primary neurons to identify drug targets for regeneration and degeneration.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2017Review
- Fibromodulin reprogrammed cells: A novel cell source for bone regeneration.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Characterization of common marmoset dysgerminoma-like tumor induced by the lentiviral expression of reprogramming factors.Cancer science · 2014Article
- Comparison of different protocols for neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells.Molecular biology reports · 2014Article
- Glucose metabolism, hyperosmotic stress, and reprogramming of somatic cells.Molecular biotechnology · 2013Review
- Influence of nanomaterials on stem cell differentiation: designing an appropriate nanobiointerface.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012Review
- Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of regenerative medicine, the development of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells may represent a potential strategy to overcome the limitations of human embryonic stem cells (ESCs). iPS cells have the potential to mimic human disease, since they carry the genome of the donor. Hypothetically, with iPS cell technology it is possible to screen patients for a genetic cause of disease (genetic mutation), develop cell lines, reprogram them back to iPS cells, finally differentiate them into one or more cell types that develop the disease. Although the creation of multiple lineages with iPS cells can seem limitless, a number of challenges need to be addressed in order to effectively use these cell lines for disease modeling. These include the low efficiency of iPS cell generation without genetic alterations, the possibility of tumor formation in vivo, the random integration of retroviral-based delivery vectors into the genome, and unregulated growth of the remaining cells that are partially reprogrammed and refractory to differentiation. The establishment of protein or RNA-based reprogramming strategies will help generate human iPS cells without permanent genetic alterations. Finally, direct reprogramming strategies can provide rapid production of models of human "diseases in a dish", without first passing the cells through a pluripotent state, so avoiding the challenges of time-consumming and labor-intensive iPS cell line generation. This review will overview methods to develop iPS cells, current strategies for direct reprogramming, and main applications of iPS cells as human disease model, focusing on human cardiovascular diseases, with the aim to be a potential information resource for biomedical scientists and clinicians who exploit or intend to exploit iPS cell technology in a range of applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.