Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22302177›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2012

Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy.

Blaž Mavčič, Vane Antolič

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomechanical analysis of combi-hole locking compression plate during fracture healing: A numerical study of screw configuration.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Blaž MavčičDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. blaz.mavcic@kclj.si
Vane Antolič

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review recent experimental and clinical publications on bone biology with respect to the optimal mechanical environment in the healing process of fractures and osteotomies. The basic postulates of bone fracture healing include static bone compression and immobilisation/ fixation for three weeks and intermittent dynamic loading treatment afterwards. The optimal mechanical strain should be in the range of 100-2,000 microstrain, depending on the frequency of the strain application, type of bone and location in the bone, age and hormonal status. Higher frequency of mechanical strain application or larger number of repetition cycles result in increased bone mass at the healing fracture site, but only up to a certain limit, values beyond which no additional benefit is observed. Strain application and transition period from non-load-bearing to full load-bearing can be modified by implants allowing dynamisation of compression and generating strains at the fracture healing site in a controlled manner.

Indexed as

OsteotomyAdaptation, PhysiologicalFracture FixationFracture HealingFractures, BoneHumansMechanotransduction, CellularOsteocytesStress, MechanicalWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID22302177
PMCPMC3311788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.