ArticleHNO2012
[High-resolution manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter].
Article in HNO, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of current methodology of high resolution pharyngeal manometry with and without impedance.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Potential for Behavioural Pressure Modulation at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Swallowing.Dysphagia · 2022Article
- Review
- [High resolution manometry study of pharyngeal function in patients with myotonic dystrophy].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) represents a valuable tool for the evaluation of peristalsis in the oesophagus. Due to the wide spacing of the pressure transducers, however, examination of the upper oesophageal sphincter's relaxation period has not proved satisfactory as yet.
designA feasibility study was carried out to clarify whether evaluation of the upper oesophageal sphincter's behaviour during swallows is possible using a catheter with very closely spaced pressure transducers.
settingUniversity hospital. PROCEDURE: Healthy subjects were analysed using a specially developed catheter as well as a modified software to evaluate whether swallow-associated behaviour could be verified.
resultsInterpreting pressure profiles in terms of resting pressure, residual pressure, relaxation time and maximum peristaltic pressure proved to be feasible. The present analysis supports the existence of distinct dynamic swallow-associated phases, which conform to the phases that had previously been postulated. An additional initial phase, however, should be added.
conclusionThis newly created catheter design in combination with the modified software enable a very detailed evaluation of the sphincter's swallow-associated behaviour and represent a valuable, minimally invasive tool with no exposure to radiation for dysphagia diagnosis as well as treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22301871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.