Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22301412›Full record

ReviewAIDS (London, England)2012

Novel clinical trial designs for the development of new antiretroviral agents.

Nina Mani, Jeffrey Murray, Roy M Gulick, Filip Josephson, Veronica Miller, Peter Miele, Jur Strobos, Kimberly Struble

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The future of HIV treatment.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina ManiForum for Collaborative HIV Research, University of California-Berkeley, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. nmani@hivforum.org
Jeffrey Murray
Roy M Gulick
Filip Josephson
Veronica Miller
Peter Miele
Jur Strobos
Kimberly Struble
United States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCornell University · USMedical Products Agency · SEPolice Executive Research Forum · US

Funding

Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-Infected PatientsK24AI051966 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GULICK, ROY M. · 2003 to 2012
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI051966NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI-51966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resounding success of combination antiretroviral efficacy for both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients - with 70-90% viral suppression rates in recent studies - has made registration trials for new agents challenging. With the inevitable specter of drug resistance, new agents must have a pathway to approval. The Forum for Collaborative HIV Research obtained input from concerned stakeholders including industry, clinical sciences, community advocacy, and regulatory sciences (Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) to discuss how safety and efficacy of new agents could be demonstrated. Recognizing the shortfalls of superiority or noninferiority trials in this environment, a new trial design for treatment-experienced patients, minimizing the risk for drug resistance but allowing full assessment of safety, was proposed. The antiviral efficacy of an active investigational drug would be assessed by comparison to placebo as an add-on to a failing regimen in a short, 10-14-day study followed by institution of an optimized background regimen (OBR) in both arms with investigational drug given to all patients. The follow-on stage would assess dose response, safety, durability of initial response, and development of resistance. Additionally, a second safety trial could be conducted comparing patients randomized to the investigational agent with a new OBR to those on a new OBR and placebo. Finally, approval decisions could consider other long-term safety endpoints. Exposing treatment-naïve patients to investigational agents remains a controversial issue; stakeholders have different interpretations of risk-benefit for trials in this population that necessitate careful consideration before initiating trials in them.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnti-Retroviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug IndustryDrugs, InvestigationalHIV InfectionsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrugs, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID22301412
PMCPMC3343181
OpenAlexW2087681115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.