Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22301401›Full record

Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2012

Phase II trial with letrozole to maximum response as primary systemic therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER/PgR[+] operable breast cancer.

Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Ángel Guerrero, Antonio Galán, Vicente Carañana, Elvira Buch, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Amparo Ruiz, Carlos Fuster Diana, Vicente Guillem Porta

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neoadjuvant Abemaciclib plus Letrozole Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with HR+/HER2- Highly Proliferative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer as a Model for Translational Research.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2019
    Review
  19. ERClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Llombart-CussacInstituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain. allombart1@yahoo.com
Ángel Guerrero
Antonio Galán
Vicente Carañana
Elvira Buch
Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
Amparo Ruiz
Carlos Fuster Diana
Vicente Guillem Porta
Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital de Sagunto · ESHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital General Universitario de Elche · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLetrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of response and breast preservation rates as primary systemic therapy (PST) in postmenopausal women with ER-positive early breast cancer. However, the optimum duration of endocrine PST remains uncertain.

methodsA phase 2 multicentre, open-label trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of letrozole over a preoperative period of 4 months to 1 year. Seventy postmenopausal patients (over 65 years) were recruited in four centers. The primary endpoint was to establish the optimal duration of treatment defined as the time required to attain the maximum response by clinical palpation.

resultsThe median age of the group was 79 years (66-91) and the median tumour size 35 mm (range 25-100 mm). No severe adverse events were reported. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for the primary objective. A total of 43 patients (76.8%) achieved an objective response; 29 (51.8%) being partial and 14 (25.0%) complete. The median time to objective response was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.3-4.5) and the median time to maximum response was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-4.5), although 20 (37.1%) patients achieved the maximal response within 6-12 months.

conclusionsLetrozole shows a high activity and excellent tolerability as neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients with endocrine-dependent breast cancer. Four to six months of letrozole as PST is an optimum duration with modest benefits thereafter.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPostmenopauseAgedAged, 80 and overAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLetrozoleNeoplasm StagingNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival RateTime FactorsAromatase InhibitorsLetrozoleNitrilesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22301401
OpenAlexW1993544627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.