Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22301020›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Evaluation of new biomarker genes for differentiating Haemophilus influenzae from Haemophilus haemolyticus.

M Jordan Theodore, Raydel D Anderson, Xin Wang, Lee S Katz, Jeni T Vuong, Melissa E Bell, Billie A Juni, Sara A Lowther, Ruth Lynfield, Jessica R MacNeil and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and Characterization of "Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Current Epidemiology and Trends in Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease-United States, 2009-2015.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Identification of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus haemolyticus by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Haemophilus haemolyticus isolates causing clinical disease.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M Jordan TheodoreMeningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA. ale7@cdc.gov
Raydel D Anderson
Xin Wang
Lee S Katz
Jeni T Vuong
Melissa E Bell
Billie A Juni
Sara A Lowther
Ruth Lynfield
Jessica R MacNeil
Leonard W Mayer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCR detecting the protein D (hpd) and fuculose kinase (fucK) genes showed high sensitivity and specificity for identifying Haemophilus influenzae and differentiating it from H. haemolyticus. Phylogenetic analysis using the 16S rRNA gene demonstrated two distinct groups for H. influenzae and H. haemolyticus.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsHaemophilus influenzaeImmunoglobulin DLipoproteinsMolecular TypingPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)PhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsGenetic MarkersglpQ protein, Haemophilus influenzaeImmunoglobulin DLipoproteinsPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)RNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID22301020
PMCPMC3318567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.