Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22300483›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2012

Nanotitanium dioxide toxicity in mouse lung is reduced in sanding dust from paint.

Anne Thoustrup Saber, Nicklas Raun Jacobsen, Alicia Mortensen, Józef Szarek, Petra Jackson, Anne Mette Madsen, Keld Alstrup Jensen, Ismo K Koponen, Gunnar Brunborg, Kristine Bjerve Gützkow and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Indoor PMIndoor air · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genotoxicity assessment of titanium dioxide nanoparticle accumulation of 90 days in the liver ofGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2020
    Article
  19. Amelioration of titanium dioxide nanoparticle reprotoxicity by the antioxidants morin and rutin.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne Thoustrup SaberThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen, Denmark. ats@nrcwe.dk
Nicklas Raun Jacobsen
Alicia Mortensen
Józef Szarek
Petra Jackson
Anne Mette Madsen
Keld Alstrup Jensen
Ismo K Koponen
Gunnar Brunborg
Kristine Bjerve Gützkow
Ulla Vogel
Håkan Wallin
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known of how the toxicity of nanoparticles is affected by the incorporation in complex matrices. We compared the toxic effects of the titanium dioxide nanoparticle UV-Titan L181 (NanoTiO2), pure or embedded in a paint matrix. We also compared the effects of the same paint with and without NanoTiO2.

methodsMice received a single intratracheal instillation of 18, 54 and 162 μg of NanoTiO2 or 54, 162 and 486 μg of the sanding dust from paint with and without NanoTiO2. DNA damage in broncheoalveolar lavage cells and liver, lung inflammation and liver histology were evaluated 1, 3 and 28 days after intratracheal instillation. Printex 90 was included as positive control.

resultsThere was no additive effect of adding NanoTiO2 to paints: Therefore the toxicity of NanoTiO2 was reduced by inclusion into a paint matrix. NanoTiO2 induced inflammation in mice with severity similar to Printex 90. The inflammatory response of NanoTiO2 and Printex 90 correlated with the instilled surface area. None of the materials, except of Printex 90, induced DNA damage in lung lining fluid cells. The highest dose of NanoTiO2 caused DNA damage in hepatic tissue 1 day after intratracheal instillation. Exposure of mice to the dust from paints with and without TiO2 was not associated with hepatic histopathological changes. Exposure to NanoTiO2 or to Printex 90 caused slight histopathological changes in the liver in some of the mice at different time points.

conclusionsPulmonary inflammation and DNA damage and hepatic histopathology were not changed in mice instilled with sanding dust from NanoTiO2 paint compared to paint without NanoTiO2. However, pure NanoTiO2 caused greater inflammation than NanoTiO2 embedded in the paint matrix.

Indexed as

DustAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDNA DamageFemaleFibrosisHumansLiverLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesPaintPneumoniaTitaniumTransforming Growth Factor betaDustTitaniumtitanium dioxideTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID22300483
PMCPMC3298479
OpenAlexW2167616343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.