Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22300089›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2012

Measurement and theory of hydrogen bonding contribution to isosteric DNA base pairs.

Omid Khakshoor, Steven E Wheeler, K N Houk, Eric T Kool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The mChemical science · 2017
    Article
  5. Helix instability and self-pairing prevent unnatural base pairs from expanding the genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. The expanded genetic alphabet.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unnatural base pair systems toward the expansion of the genetic alphabet in the central dogma.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Omid KhakshoorDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Steven E Wheeler
K N Houk
Eric T Kool
Stanford University · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Probing Nucleotide Recognition in the Genetic Information PathwayR01GM072705 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOOL, ERIC T. · 2004 to 2012
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM072705NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address the recent debate surrounding the ability of 2,4-difluorotoluene (F), a low-polarity mimic of thymine (T), to form a hydrogen-bonded complex with adenine in DNA. The hydrogen bonding ability of F has been characterized as small to zero in various experimental studies, and moderate to small in computational studies. However, recent X-ray crystallographic studies of difluorotoluene in DNA/RNA have indicated, based on interatomic distances, possible hydrogen bonding interactions between F and natural bases in nucleic acid duplexes and in a DNA polymerase active site. Since F is widely used to measure electrostatic contributions to pairing and replication, it is important to quantify the impact of this isostere on DNA stability. Here, we studied the pairing stability and selectivity of this compound and a closely related variant, dichlorotoluene deoxyriboside (L), in DNA, using both experimental and computational approaches. We measured the thermodynamics of duplex formation in three sequence contexts and with all possible pairing partners by thermal melting studies using the van't Hoff approach, and for selected cases by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Experimental results showed that internal F-A pairing in DNA is destabilizing by 3.8 kcal/mol (van't Hoff, 37 °C) as compared with T-A pairing. At the end of a duplex, base-base interactions are considerably smaller; however, the net F-A interaction remains repulsive while T-A pairing is attractive. As for selectivity, F is found to be slightly selective for adenine over C, G, T by 0.5 kcal mol, as compared with thymine's selectivity of 2.4 kcal/mol. Interestingly, dichlorotoluene in DNA is slightly less destabilizing and slightly more selective than F, despite the lack of strongly electronegative fluorine atoms. Experimental data were complemented by computational results, evaluated at the M06-2X/6-31+G(d) and MP2/cc-pVTZ levels of theory. These computations suggest that the pairing energy of F to A is ~28% of that of T-A, and most of this interaction does not arise from the F···HN interaction, but rather from the CH···N interaction. The nucleobase analogue shows no inherent selectivity for adenine over other bases, and L-A pairing energies are slightly weaker than for F-A. Overall, the results are consistent with a small favorable noncovalent interaction of F with A offset by a large desolvation cost for the polar partner. We discuss the findings in light of recent structural studies and of DNA replication experiments involving these analogues.

Indexed as

Hydrogen BondingAdenineAlgorithmsBase PairingBase SequenceCalorimetryCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseModels, ChemicalMolecular Sequence DataRNASoftwareStatic ElectricityTemperature2,4-dichlorotolueneAdenineDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNAThymineToluene

Identifiers

PMID22300089
PMCPMC3293652
OpenAlexW2072541702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.