Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22298851›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2012

Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.

Jean-Christophe Billeter, Samyukta Jagadeesh, Nancy Stepek, Reza Azanchi, Joel D Levine

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnosing confounded Bateman gradients.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-term neuropeptide modulation of female sexual drive via the TRP channel inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Plastic responses of males and females interact to determine mating behavior.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  15. Inheritance of pheromone profiles from agedmicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Social effects on fruit fly courtship song.Ecology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean-Christophe BilleterDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.
Samyukta Jagadeesh
Nancy Stepek
Reza Azanchi
Joel D Levine

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, biological rhythms, aggression and mating are modulated by group size and composition. However, the fitness significance of this group effect is unknown. By varying the composition of groups of males and females, we show that social context affects reproductive behaviour and offspring genetic diversity. Firstly, females mating with males from the same strain in the presence of males from a different strain are infecund, analogous to the Bruce effect in rodents, suggesting a social context-dependent inbreeding avoidance mechanism. Secondly, females mate more frequently in groups composed of males from more than one strain; this mitigates last male sperm precedence and increases offspring genetic diversity. However, smell-impaired Orco mutant females do not increase mating frequency according to group composition; this indicates that social context-dependent changes in reproductive behaviour depend on female olfaction, rather than direct male-male interactions. Further, variation in mating frequency in wild-type strains depends on females and not males. The data show that group composition can affect variance in the reproductive success of its members, and that females play a central role in this process. Social environment can thus influence the evolutionary process.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSocial EnvironmentAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic FitnessLinear ModelsMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalSmell

Identifiers

PMID22298851
PMCPMC3350680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.