ArticleGenetics2012
A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of regulatory evolution in yeast.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- Article
- Molecular and evolutionary processes generating variation in gene expression.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021Review
- Unmatched Level of Molecular Convergence among Deeply Divergent Complex Multicellular Fungi.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- An integrative genomic analysis of the Longshanks selection experiment for longer limbs in mice.eLife · 2019Article
- Distributions of Mutational Effects and the Estimation of Directional Selection in Divergent Lineages ofGenetics · 2017Article
- Contrasting Frequencies and Effects of cis- and trans-Regulatory Mutations Affecting Gene Expression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Population perspectives on functional genomic variation in yeast.Briefings in functional genomics · 2016Review
- Multiple-Line Inference of Selection on Quantitative Traits.Genetics · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- Composite selection signals can localize the trait specific genomic regions in multi-breed populations of cattle and sheep.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Resampling QTL effects in the QTL sign test leads to incongruous sensitivity to variance in effect size.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary biologists attribute much of the phenotypic diversity observed in nature to the action of natural selection. However, for many phenotypic traits, especially quantitative phenotypic traits, it has been challenging to test for the historical action of selection. An important challenge for biologists studying quantitative traits, therefore, is to distinguish between traits that have evolved under the influence of strong selection and those that have evolved neutrally. Most existing tests for selection employ molecular data, but selection also leaves a mark on the genetic architecture underlying a trait. In particular, the distribution of quantitative trait locus (QTL) effect sizes and the distribution of mutational effects together provide information regarding the history of selection. Despite the increasing availability of QTL and mutation accumulation data, such data have not yet been effectively exploited for this purpose. We present a model of the evolution of QTL and employ it to formulate a test for historical selection. To provide a baseline for neutral evolution of the trait, we estimate the distribution of mutational effects from mutation accumulation experiments. We then apply a maximum-likelihood-based method of inference to estimate the range of selection strengths under which such a distribution of mutations could generate the observed QTL. Our test thus represents the first integration of population genetic theory and QTL data to measure the historical influence of selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.