Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297807›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2012

Developing a self-reported physical fitness survey.

Nicole R Keith, Timothy E Stump, Daniel O Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Factors affecting executive function performance of Brazilian elderly in the Stroop test.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole R KeithIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN, USA. nkeith@iupui.edu
Timothy E Stump
Daniel O Clark

Funding

TRANSLATION RESEARCH ON CHRONIC DISEASE SELF-MANAGEMENTP30AG024967 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$3.2M
Self Reported Fitness SurveyK01HL096423 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KEITH, NICOLE RUTH · 2009 to 2012
$443k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL096423NHLBI NIH HHS K01HL096423NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPhysical fitness measures indicate health status, and these can be used to improve management of overall health. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the development of a self-reported fitness (SRFit) survey intended to estimate fitness in adults age ≥40 yr across four domains: 1) muscular strength and endurance, 2) cardiovascular fitness, 3) flexibility, and 4) body composition.

methodsSRFit items were developed from the previously validated Rikli and Jones Senior Fitness Test battery of physical tests. Face-to-face participant interviews were used to refine SRFit item wording. Data from a pilot administration of the SRFit survey were used to guide further revisions of SRFit items. The Senior Fitness Test battery was used to evaluate the four fitness domains. The BodPod was used to measure body composition. Height, weight, and resting blood pressure were measured, and the revised SRFit survey was administered to 108 participants.

resultsForty-five percent of the participants were women and 37% reported being black or in the "other" race category. Mean age was 53.5 ± 8.0 yr and mean body mass index was 30.6 ± 8.8 kg·m(-2). Mean ± SD SRFit summary scores and correlations found between summary and fitness test scores were as follows: upper body strength = 12.8 ± 2.4, r = 0.59, P < 0.001; lower body strength = 12.6 ± 2.6, r = 0.68, P < 0.001; upper body flexibility (left side) = 12.3 ± 2.8, r = 0.47, P < 0.001; upper body flexibility (right side) = 12.4 ± 2.8, r = 0.67, P < 0.001; lower body flexibility = 17.4 ± 3.8, r = 0.55, P < 0.001; cardiovascular endurance = 12.9 ± 2.6, r = 0.66, P < 0.001; body mass index = 7.7 ± 2.23, r = 0.79, P < 0.001; and percent body fat = 7.7 ± 2.2, r = 0.78, P < 0.001.

conclusionsSRFit survey items in each fitness domain were correlated with analogous Senior Fitness Test items, indicating that participants can accurately use the SRFit survey to self-report physical fitness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndianaMaleMiddle AgedPhysical FitnessReproducibility of ResultsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID22297807
PMCPMC3366048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.