ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2012
Developing a self-reported physical fitness survey.
Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with health service utilization among Iranian pilgrims during the 2023 Arbaeen pilgrimage in Iraq: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Association between self-reported and objectively assessed physical functioning in the general population.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cognitive Enhancement Strategies for Older Adults: An Evaluation of Different Training Modalities to Improve Executive Function-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Self-Reported Questionnaire to Evaluate Functional Abilities in Middle Age: A Call for Delphi Expert Panel.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Factors affecting executive function performance of Brazilian elderly in the Stroop test.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022Article
- Reliability and validity of the Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale Version 1.0 (HFMS V1.0) in Chinese people.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Squats in Surveys: Investigating the Feasibility of, Compliance With, and Respondents' Performance on Fitness Tasks in Self-Administered Smartphone Surveys Using Acceleration Data.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Active and Fit Communities. Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Health-Related Fitness in Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Article
- Article
- Validity and reliability of the Self-Reported Physical Fitness (SRFit) survey.Journal of physical activity & health · 2014Article
- Validity of self-reported fitness across black and white race, gender, and health literacy subgroups.American journal of health promotion : AJHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledPhysical fitness measures indicate health status, and these can be used to improve management of overall health. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the development of a self-reported fitness (SRFit) survey intended to estimate fitness in adults age ≥40 yr across four domains: 1) muscular strength and endurance, 2) cardiovascular fitness, 3) flexibility, and 4) body composition.
methodsSRFit items were developed from the previously validated Rikli and Jones Senior Fitness Test battery of physical tests. Face-to-face participant interviews were used to refine SRFit item wording. Data from a pilot administration of the SRFit survey were used to guide further revisions of SRFit items. The Senior Fitness Test battery was used to evaluate the four fitness domains. The BodPod was used to measure body composition. Height, weight, and resting blood pressure were measured, and the revised SRFit survey was administered to 108 participants.
resultsForty-five percent of the participants were women and 37% reported being black or in the "other" race category. Mean age was 53.5 ± 8.0 yr and mean body mass index was 30.6 ± 8.8 kg·m(-2). Mean ± SD SRFit summary scores and correlations found between summary and fitness test scores were as follows: upper body strength = 12.8 ± 2.4, r = 0.59, P < 0.001; lower body strength = 12.6 ± 2.6, r = 0.68, P < 0.001; upper body flexibility (left side) = 12.3 ± 2.8, r = 0.47, P < 0.001; upper body flexibility (right side) = 12.4 ± 2.8, r = 0.67, P < 0.001; lower body flexibility = 17.4 ± 3.8, r = 0.55, P < 0.001; cardiovascular endurance = 12.9 ± 2.6, r = 0.66, P < 0.001; body mass index = 7.7 ± 2.23, r = 0.79, P < 0.001; and percent body fat = 7.7 ± 2.2, r = 0.78, P < 0.001.
conclusionsSRFit survey items in each fitness domain were correlated with analogous Senior Fitness Test items, indicating that participants can accurately use the SRFit survey to self-report physical fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.