Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297704›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Pull-down of calmodulin-binding proteins.

Kanwardeep S Kaleka, Amber N Petersen, Matthew A Florence, Nashaat Z Gerges

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A mutually induced conformational fit underlies CaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  7. Neurogranin Regulates Metaplasticity.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kanwardeep S KalekaDepartment of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, USA.
Amber N Petersen
Matthew A Florence
Nashaat Z Gerges
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Role of Neurogranin in Hippocampal Synaptic PlasticityR01AG032320 · NIA · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI GERGES, NASHAAT Z · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS AG032320NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium (Ca(2+)) is an ion vital in regulating cellular function through a variety of mechanisms. Much of Ca(2+) signaling is mediated through the calcium-binding protein known as calmodulin (CaM). CaM is involved at multiple levels in almost all cellular processes, including apoptosis, metabolism, smooth muscle contraction, synaptic plasticity, nerve growth, inflammation and the immune response. A number of proteins help regulate these pathways through their interaction with CaM. Many of these interactions depend on the conformation of CaM, which is distinctly different when bound to Ca(2+) (Ca(2+)-CaM) as opposed to its Ca(2+)-free state (ApoCaM). While most target proteins bind Ca(2+)-CaM, certain proteins only bind to ApoCaM. Some bind CaM through their IQ-domain, including neuromodulin, neurogranin (Ng), and certain myosins. These proteins have been shown to play important roles in presynaptic function, postsynaptic function, and muscle contraction, respectively. Their ability to bind and release CaM in the absence or presence of Ca(2+) is pivotal in their function. In contrast, many proteins only bind Ca(2+)-CaM and require this binding for their activation. Examples include myosin light chain kinase, Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent kinases (CaMKs) and phosphatases (e.g. calcineurin), and spectrin kinase, which have a variety of direct and downstream effects. The effects of these proteins on cellular function are often dependent on their ability to bind to CaM in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. For example, we tested the relevance of Ng-CaM binding in synaptic function and how different mutations affect this binding. We generated a GFP-tagged Ng construct with specific mutations in the IQ-domain that would change the ability of Ng to bind CaM in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. The study of these different mutations gave us great insight into important processes involved in synaptic function. However, in such studies, it is essential to demonstrate that the mutated proteins have the expected altered binding to CaM. Here, we present a method for testing the ability of proteins to bind to CaM in the presence or absence of Ca(2+), using CaMKII and Ng as examples. This method is a form of affinity chromatography referred to as a CaM pull-down assay. It uses CaM-Sepharose beads to test proteins that bind to CaM and the influence of Ca(2+) on this binding. It is considerably more time efficient and requires less protein relative to column chromatography and other assays. Altogether, this provides a valuable tool to explore Ca(2+)/CaM signaling and proteins that interact with CaM.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Calmodulin-Binding ProteinsChromatography, AffinityGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHippocampusHumansProtein BindingSepharoseCalciumCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Calmodulin-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSepharose

Identifiers

PMID22297704
PMCPMC3462570
OpenAlexW1976674188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.