Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2012
Clinical decision support to promote safe prescribing to women of reproductive age: a cluster-randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04879745 (A Pilot Study of the MyVoice), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study of the MyVoice:Rheum Decision Aid to Address the Reproductive Health Needs of Women With Rheumatic Diseases
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How does the Content and Dissemination of Communications on the Risks of Medicines Affect Prescriber Awareness, Knowledge, and Behaviour: A Systematic Review.Drug safety · 2026Pooled it
- The Effect of Computerized Alerts on Prescribing and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review.Health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Pooled it
- Risks to patient safety associated with implementation of electronic applications for medication management in ambulatory care--a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Pooled it
- The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Text Message Delivery of a Digital Tool for Reproductive Health Discussions in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient-Centered Reproductive Decision Aid for Pregnancy-Capable People With Rheumatic Diseases.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Observational
- From "Local Control" to "Dependency": Transitions to Single-Vendor Integrated Electronic Health Record Systems and Their Implications for the EHR Workforce.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating the MyPath web-based reproductive decision support tool in VA primary care: Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient-Centered Web-Based Reproductive Decision Support Tool for Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Use of Hospital Information System to Improve the Quality of Health Care from Clinical Staff Perspective.Galen medical journal · 2021Article
- Pregnancy protection and pregnancies in women prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Article
- Improving Safe Use of Medications During Pregnancy: The Roles of Patients, Physicians, and Pharmacists.Qualitative health research · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPotentially teratogenic medications are frequently prescribed without provision of contraceptive counseling.
objectiveTo evaluate whether computerized clinical decision support (CDS) can increase primary care providers' (PCPs') provision of family planning services when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications.
designCluster-randomized trial conducted in one academic and one community-based practice between October of 2008 and April of 2010. PARTICIPANTS/
interventionsForty-one PCPs were randomized to receive one of two types of CDS which alerted them to risks of medication-induced birth defects when ordering potentially teratogenic medications for women who may become pregnant. The 'simple' CDS provided a cautionary alert; the 'multifaceted' CDS provided tailored information and links to a structured order set designed to facilitate safe prescribing. Both CDS systems alerted PCPs about medication risk only once per encounter. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed change in documented provision of family planning services using data from 35,110 encounters and mixed-effects models. PCPs completed surveys before and after the CDS systems were implemented, allowing assessment of change in PCP-reported counseling about the risks of medication-induced birth defects and contraception. KEY
resultsBoth CDS systems were associated with slight increases in provision of family planning services when potential teratogens were prescribed, without a significant difference in improvement by CDS complexity (p = 0.87). Because CDS was not repeated, 13% of the times that PCPs received CDS they substituted another potential teratogen. PCPs reported significant improvements in several counseling and prescribing practices. The multifaceted group reported a greater increase in the number of times per month they discussed the risks of medication use during pregnancy (multifaceted: +4.9 ± 7.0 vs. simple: +0.8 ± 3.2, p = 0.03). The simple CDS system was associated with greater clinician satisfaction.
conclusionsCDS systems hold promise for increasing provision of family planning services when fertile women are prescribed potentially teratogenic medications, but further refinement of these systems is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.