Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297687›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2012

Clinical decision support to promote safe prescribing to women of reproductive age: a cluster-randomized trial.

Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Sara M Parisi, Steven M Handler, Gideon Koren, Elan D Cohen, Grant J Shevchik, Gary S Fischer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04879745 (A Pilot Study of the MyVoice), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04879745 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study of the MyVoice:Rheum Decision Aid to Address the Reproductive Health Needs of Women With Rheumatic Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2021 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsRheumatic Diseases, Physician-Patient Relations, ContraceptionArmsMyVoice:Rheum, Pamphlet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pregnancy protection and pregnancies in women prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleanor Bimla SchwarzDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Schwarzeb@upmc.edu
Sara M Parisi
Steven M Handler
Gideon Koren
Elan D Cohen
Grant J Shevchik
Gary S Fischer

Funding

Harnessing Health IT to Prevent Medication-Induced Birth DefectsR18HS017093 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHWARZ, ELEANOR BIMLA · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017093AHRQ HHS R18HS017093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotentially teratogenic medications are frequently prescribed without provision of contraceptive counseling.

objectiveTo evaluate whether computerized clinical decision support (CDS) can increase primary care providers' (PCPs') provision of family planning services when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications.

designCluster-randomized trial conducted in one academic and one community-based practice between October of 2008 and April of 2010. PARTICIPANTS/

interventionsForty-one PCPs were randomized to receive one of two types of CDS which alerted them to risks of medication-induced birth defects when ordering potentially teratogenic medications for women who may become pregnant. The 'simple' CDS provided a cautionary alert; the 'multifaceted' CDS provided tailored information and links to a structured order set designed to facilitate safe prescribing. Both CDS systems alerted PCPs about medication risk only once per encounter. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed change in documented provision of family planning services using data from 35,110 encounters and mixed-effects models. PCPs completed surveys before and after the CDS systems were implemented, allowing assessment of change in PCP-reported counseling about the risks of medication-induced birth defects and contraception. KEY

resultsBoth CDS systems were associated with slight increases in provision of family planning services when potential teratogens were prescribed, without a significant difference in improvement by CDS complexity (p = 0.87). Because CDS was not repeated, 13% of the times that PCPs received CDS they substituted another potential teratogen. PCPs reported significant improvements in several counseling and prescribing practices. The multifaceted group reported a greater increase in the number of times per month they discussed the risks of medication use during pregnancy (multifaceted: +4.9 ± 7.0 vs. simple: +0.8 ± 3.2, p = 0.03). The simple CDS system was associated with greater clinician satisfaction.

conclusionsCDS systems hold promise for increasing provision of family planning services when fertile women are prescribed potentially teratogenic medications, but further refinement of these systems is needed.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalAbnormalities, Drug-InducedAdolescentAdultCounselingDrug PrescriptionsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicPennsylvaniaPhysician-Patient RelationsPreconception CarePrimary Health CareTeratogens

Identifiers

PMID22297687
PMCPMC3378745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.