Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297669›Full record

ReviewKidney international2012

Pros and cons for C4d as a biomarker.

Danielle Cohen, Robert B Colvin, Mohamed R Daha, Cinthia B Drachenberg, Mark Haas, Volker Nickeleit, Jane E Salmon, Banu Sis, Ming-Hui Zhao, Jan A Bruijn and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Emerging roles for complement in lung transplantation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  6. C4d Immunoreactivity in Autoimmune and HBV-Induced Hepatitis: Implications for Complement-Mediated Hepatocellular Injury.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. B Cell Tolerance and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Danielle CohenDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. d.cohen@lumc.nl
Robert B Colvin
Mohamed R Daha
Cinthia B Drachenberg
Mark Haas
Volker Nickeleit
Jane E Salmon
Banu Sis
Ming-Hui Zhao
Jan A Bruijn
Ingeborg M Bajema
Leiden University Medical Center · NLCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCornell University · USHarvard University · USPeking University · CNUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome In SLE and APSR01AR049772 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI SALMON, JANE E · 2003 to 2012
$12.6M
Tolerance to Composite Islet-Kidney Transplants in Non-Human PrimatesU19AI102405 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COSIMI, A BENEDICT · 2012 to 2016
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI102405NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of C4d in daily clinical practice in the late nineties aroused an ever-increasing interest in the role of antibody-mediated mechanisms in allograft rejection. As a marker of classical complement activation, C4d made it possible to visualize the direct link between anti-donor antibodies and tissue injury at sites of antibody binding in a graft. With the expanding use of C4d worldwide several limitations of C4d were identified. For instance, in ABO-incompatible transplantations C4d is present in the majority of grafts but this seems to point at 'graft accommodation' rather than antibody-mediated rejection. C4d is now increasingly recognized as a potential biomarker in other fields where antibodies can cause tissue damage, such as systemic autoimmune diseases and pregnancy. In all these fields, C4d holds promise to detect patients at risk for the consequences of antibody-mediated disease. Moreover, the emergence of new therapeutics that block complement activation makes C4d a marker with potential to identify patients who may possibly benefit from these drugs. This review provides an overview of the past, present, and future perspectives of C4d as a biomarker, focusing on its use in solid organ transplantation and discussing its possible new roles in autoimmunity and pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAutoimmunityBiomarkersComplement C4bFemaleGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationHumansKidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationLung TransplantationMaleModels, ImmunologicalPancreas TransplantationPeptide FragmentsBiomarkersComplement C4bcomplement C4dPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID22297669
PMCPMC3771104
OpenAlexW2072019856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.