Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297085›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2012

Risk of new acute myocardial infarction hospitalization associated with use of oral and parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammation drugs (NSAIDs): a case-crossover study of Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database and review of current evidence.

Wen-Yi Shau, Hsi-Chieh Chen, Shu-Ting Chen, Hsu-Wen Chou, Chia-Hsuin Chang, Chuei-Wen Kuo, Mei-Shu Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Omega-3 PUFA vs. NSAIDs for Preventing Cardiac Inflammation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sulindac activates NF-κB signaling in colon cancer cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2013
    Article
  20. Piroxicam-β-cyclodextrin: a GI safer piroxicam.Current medicinal chemistry · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Yi ShauCenter for Drug Evaluation, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, and Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 5F18, No, 17, Hsuchow Road, Taipei 100, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsi-Chieh Chen
Shu-Ting Chen
Hsu-Wen Chou
Chia-Hsuin Chang
Chuei-Wen Kuo
Mei-Shu Lai
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWDevelopment Center for Biotechnology · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have documented the increased cardiovascular risk associated with the use of some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Despite this, many old NSAIDs are still prescribed worldwide. Most of the studies to date have been focused on specific oral drugs or limited by the number of cases examined. We studied the risk of new acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalization with current use of a variety of oral and parenteral NSAIDs in a nationwide population, and compared our results with existing evidence.

methodsWe conducted a case-crossover study using the Taiwan's National Health Insurance claim database, identifying patients with new AMI hospitalized in 2006. The 1-30 days and 91-120 days prior to the admission were defined as case and matched control period for each patient, respectively. Uses of NSAIDs during the respective periods were compared using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for use of co-medications.

results8354 new AMI hospitalization patients fulfilled the study criteria. 14 oral and 3 parenteral NSAIDs were selected based on drug utilization profile among 13.7 million NSAID users. The adjusted odds ratio, aOR (95% confidence interval), for risk of AMI and use of oral and parenteral non-selective NSAIDs were 1.42 (1.29, 1.56) and 3.35 (2.50, 4.47), respectively, and significantly greater for parenteral than oral drugs (p for interaction<0.01). Ketorolac was associated with the highest AMI risk among both of oral and parenteral NSAIDs studied, the aORs were 2.02 (1.00, 4.09) and 4.27 (2.90, 6.29) respectively. Use of oral flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, sulindac, diclofenac, and parenteral ketoprofen were also significantly associated with increased AMI risk. The results of the present study were consistent with the majority of evidence from previous studies.

conclusionsThe collective evidence revealed the tendency of increased AMI risk with current use of some NSAIDs. A higher AMI risk associated with use of parenteral NSAIDs was observed in the present study. Ketorolac had the highest associated risk in both oral and parenteral NSAIDs studied. Though further investigation to confirm the association is warranted, prescribing physicians and the general public should be cautious about the potential risk of AMI when using NSAIDs.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCross-Over StudiesCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOdds RatioRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCyclooxygenase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22297085
PMCPMC3395814
OpenAlexW2145761072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.