Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22297067›Full record

SynthesisJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2012

Mapping vulnerability to bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Paolo Fusar-Poli, Oliver Howes, Andreas Bechdolf, Stefan Borgwardt

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Risk for Schizophrenia-Bipolar Spectrum: Does the Apple Fall Close to the Tree? A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Correspondence between patterns of cerebral blood flow and structure in adolescents with and without bipolar disorder.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diffusion imaging markers of bipolar versus general psychopathology risk in youth at-risk.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo Fusar-PoliInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. p.fusar@libero.it
Oliver Howes
Andreas Bechdolf
Stefan Borgwardt
King's College London · GBOrygen Youth Health · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council MC_U120097115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough early interventions in individuals with bipolar disorder may reduce the associated personal and economic burden, the neurobiologic markers of enhanced risk are unknown.

methodsNeuroimaging studies involving individuals at enhanced genetic risk for bipolar disorder (HR) were included in a systematic review. We then performed a region of interest (ROI) analysis and a whole-brain meta-analysis combined with a formal effect-sizes meta-analysis in a subset of studies.

resultsThere were 37 studies included in our systematic review. The overall sample for the systematic review included 1258 controls and 996 HR individuals. No significant differences were detected between HR individuals and controls in the selected ROIs: striatum, amygdala, hippocampus, pituitary and frontal lobe. The HR group showed increased grey matter volume compared with patients with established bipolar disorder. The HR individuals showed increased neural response in the left superior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus and left insula compared with controls, independent from the functional magnetic resonance imaging task used. There were no publication biases. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results. LIMITATIONS: As the included studies were cross-sectional, it remains to be determined whether the observed neurofunctional and structural alterations represent risk factors that can be clinically used in preventive interventions for prodromal bipolar disorder.

conclusionAccumulating structural and functional imaging evidence supports the existence of neurobiologic trait abnormalities in individuals at genetic risk for bipolar disorder at various scales of investigation.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAdultBipolar DisorderBrainBrain MappingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPublication BiasRiskYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22297067
PMCPMC3341409
OpenAlexW1999196329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.