Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22296791›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2012

Comparison of two broadly multiplexed PCR systems for viral detection in clinical respiratory tract specimens from immunocompromised children.

Randall T Hayden, Zhengming Gu, Alicia Rodriguez, Lisa Tanioka, Claire Ying, Markus Morgenstern, Matthew J Bankowski

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rapid diagnosis of influenza: state of the art.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Molecular detection of respiratory viruses.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Randall T HaydenDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, United States. Randall.Hayden@stjude.org
Zhengming Gu
Alicia Rodriguez
Lisa Tanioka
Claire Ying
Markus Morgenstern
Matthew J Bankowski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of viral respiratory tract infections has evolved greatly with the development of PCR based commercial systems capable of simultaneously detecting a wide variety of pathogens.

objectivesEvaluate the relative performance of two commercial broad range systems for the detection of viral agents in clinical respiratory tract specimens from immunocompromised children. STUDY

designA total of 176 patient samples were included in the analysis, representing only the first sample collected for each patient, and excluding failed reactions. Samples were de-identified and assayed in parallel using two different, broadly multiplexed PCR systems: ResPlex™ II Panel v2.0 (ResPlex), Qiagen, Hilden, Germany and FilmArray(®) Respiratory Panel (FilmArray), Idaho Technology Inc., Salt Lake City, UT. Method comparison was based upon pair-wise concordance of results according to patient age, viral target and number of targets detected.

resultsThe two systems showed an overall concordance, by patient, of 83.8% (p=0.0001). FilmArray detected at least one target in 68.8% of samples, while ResPlex detected at least one target in 56.8%. ResPlex failed to detect 20.7% of FilmArray positives, and FilmArray failed to detect 4% of ResPlex positives. The relative performance of each system (including which system detected a higher number of positive samples) varied when stratified by target viral pathogen.

conclusionsBroadly multiplexed PCR is an effective means of detecting large numbers of clinically relevant respiratory viral pathogens.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory SystemRespiratory Tract InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityVirus DiseasesVirusesReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID22296791
PMCPMC7108354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.