Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22296719›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2012

Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review.

Jessica J Lewis, Subhrendu K Pattanayak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03352830 (Understanding Adoption of Clean Cookstoves), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03352830 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Adoption of Clean Cookstoves

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled781ConditionsBehavior, Consumer, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health AttitudeArmsRANAS Behavior Change Intervention, Infrastructural Intervention - Direct Delivery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The use and impacts of an ethanol cooking fuel promotion pilot in Dar es Salaam.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica J LewisNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0312, USA.
Subhrendu K Pattanayak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global focus on improved cookstoves (ICSs) and clean fuels has increased because of their potential for delivering triple dividends: household health, local environmental quality, and regional climate benefits. However, ICS and clean fuel dissemination programs have met with low rates of adoption.

objectivesWe reviewed empirical studies on ICSs and fuel choice to describe the literature, examine determinants of fuel and stove choice, and identify knowledge gaps.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature on the adoption of ICSs or cleaner fuels by households in developing countries. Results are synthesized through a simple vote-counting meta-analysis.

resultsWe identified 32 research studies that reported 146 separate regression analyses of ICS adoption (11 analyses) or fuel choice (135 analyses) from Asia (60%), Africa (27%), and Latin America (19%). Most studies apply multivariate regression methods to consider 7-13 determinants of choice. Income, education, and urban location were positively associated with adoption in most but not all studies. However, the influence of fuel availability and prices, household size and composition, and sex is unclear. Potentially important drivers such as credit, supply-chain strengthening, and social marketing have been ignored.

conclusionsAdoption studies of ICSs or clean energy are scarce, scattered, and of differential quality, even though global distribution programs are quickly expanding. Future research should examine an expanded set of contextual variables to improve implementation of stove programs that can realize the "win-win-win" of health, local environmental quality, and climate associated with these technologies.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCookingDeveloping CountriesRegression AnalysisResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID22296719
PMCPMC3346782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.