Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22295234›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2011

Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology.

Vivek Patkar, Dionisio Acosta, Tim Davidson, Alison Jones, John Fox, Mohammad Keshtgar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05355727 (PROSAIC-DS), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05355727 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

PROSAIC-DS (PROState AI in Cancer - Decision Support): Evaluation of the Deontics AI Platform for Evidence-based Treatment Planning in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: Increasing Compliance and Streamlining MDTs in Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1,040ConditionsProstate CancerArmsClinical decision support tool recommended outcome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infective endocarditis: it takes a team.European heart journal · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek PatkarBreast Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Dionisio Acosta
Tim Davidson
Alison Jones
John Fox
Mohammad Keshtgar
University College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) model in cancer care was introduced and endorsed to ensure that care delivery is consistent with the best available evidence. Over the last few years, regular MDT meetings have become a standard practice in oncology and gained the status of the key decision-making forum for patient management. Despite the fact that cancer MDT meetings are well accepted by clinicians, concerns are raised over the paucity of good-quality evidence on their overall impact. There are also concerns over lack of the appropriate support for this important but overburdened decision-making platform. The growing acceptance by clinical community of the health information technology in recent years has created new opportunities and possibilities of using advanced clinical decision support (CDS) systems to realise full potential of cancer MDT meetings. In this paper, we present targeted summary of the available evidence on the impact of cancer MDT meetings, discuss the reported challenges, and explore the role that a CDS technology could play in addressing some of these challenges.

Identifiers

PMID22295234
PMCPMC3262556
OpenAlexW2019243265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.