ReviewToxins2011
Phytotoxins produced by fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases.
Review in Toxins, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acetate Signalling Regulates Virulence-Associated Traits in the Esca PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Musts from Esca-Proper-Affected 'Primitivo' Vines on Two CommercialPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond Koch's postulates: the pathobiome paradigm in grapevine esca disease.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Review
- Mitigating grapevine esca disease: an innovative integrated management strategy to reduce incidence and severity by enhancing plant physiology and defence mechanisms.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Grapevine exarcerbates the virulence ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Metabolic and Phytotoxic Profile of Phytopathogens in Main Extensive Crops of Argentina.Toxins · 2025Article
- Differential physiological responses of resistant and susceptible grape cultivars to Eutypa dieback.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Landscape-scale endophytic community analyses in replicated grapevine stands reveal that dieback disease is unlikely to be caused by specific fungal communities.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Discovery of Novel Phenolic Compounds fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A New Root and Trunk Rot Disease of Grapevine Plantlets Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in the molecular mechanism of grapevine resistance to fungal diseases.Molecular horticulture · 2025Review
- Genome sequencing and analysis of isolates of Cytospora sorbicola and Cytospora plurivora associated with almond and peach canker.PloS one · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Melting assays development for discrimination of fungal pathogens causing Grapevine Trunk Diseases.PloS one · 2025Article
- What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?Studies in mycology · 2024Article
- Physiological and developmental disturbances caused by Botryosphaeria dieback in the annual stems of grapevine.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequencing and analysis of multiple isolates of Ceratocystis destructans, the causal agent of Ceratocystis canker of almond in California.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- HybridPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Microbial Biological Control of Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Strain Diversity, Modes of Action, and Advantages and Limits of Current Strategies.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Fungal wood-degrading enzymes in esca-diseased grapevine and effects of carbohydrate environment on fungal development.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Susceptibility of pruning wounds to grapevine trunk diseases: A quantitative analysis of literature data.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to 60 species of fungi in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, genera Cadophora, Cryptovalsa, Cylindrocarpon, Diatrype, Diatrypella, Eutypa, Eutypella, Fomitiporella, Fomitiporia, Inocutis, Phaeoacremonium and Phaeomoniella have been isolated from decline-affected grapevines all around the World. The main grapevine trunk diseases of mature vines are Eutypa dieback, the esca complex and cankers caused by the Botryospheriaceae, while in young vines the main diseases are Petri and black foot diseases. To understand the mechanism of these decline-associated diseases and the symptoms associated with them, the toxins produced by the pathogens involved in these diseases were isolated and characterised chemically and biologically. So far the toxins of only a small number of these decline fungi have been studied. This paper presents an overview of the toxins produced by the most serious of these vine wood pathogens: Eutypa lata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and some taxa in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, and examines how these toxins produce decline symptoms. The chemical structure of these metabolites and in some cases their vivotoxin nature are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.