Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22295120›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

High resolution in vivo bioluminescent imaging for the study of bacterial tumour targeting.

Michelle Cronin, Ali R Akin, Sara A Collins, Jeff Meganck, Jae-Beom Kim, Chwanrow K Baban, Susan A Joyce, Gooitzen M van Dam, Ning Zhang, Douwe van Sinderen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial Biotechnology in Medicine.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Engineering probioticApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacteria-Based Living Probes: Preparation and the Applications in Bioimaging and Diagnosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Microbiome research reports · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bacterial bioluminescence assay for bioanalysis and bioimaging.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Bioluminescent Imaging Systems for Assay Developments.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021
    Review
  19. Recent Development of ProbioticFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle CroninCork Cancer Research Centre, Mercy University Hospital and Leslie C. Quick Jr. Laboratory, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ali R Akin
Sara A Collins
Jeff Meganck
Jae-Beom Kim
Chwanrow K Baban
Susan A Joyce
Gooitzen M van Dam
Ning Zhang
Douwe van Sinderen
Gerald C O'Sullivan
Noriyuki Kasahara
Cormac G Gahan
Kevin P Francis
Mark Tangney
PerkinElmer (United States) · USUniversity College Cork · IEMercy University Hospital · IEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to track microbes in real time in vivo is of enormous value for preclinical investigations in infectious disease or gene therapy research. Bacteria present an attractive class of vector for cancer therapy, possessing a natural ability to grow preferentially within tumours following systemic administration. Bioluminescent Imaging (BLI) represents a powerful tool for use with bacteria engineered to express reporter genes such as lux. BLI is traditionally used as a 2D modality resulting in images that are limited in their ability to anatomically locate cell populations. Use of 3D diffuse optical tomography can localize the signals but still need to be combined with an anatomical imaging modality like micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) for interpretation.In this study, the non-pathogenic commensal bacteria E. coli K-12 MG1655 and Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003, or Salmonella Typhimurium SL7207 each expressing the luxABCDE operon were intravenously (i.v.) administered to mice bearing subcutaneous (s.c) FLuc-expressing xenograft tumours. Bacterial lux signal was detected specifically in tumours of mice post i.v.-administration and bioluminescence correlated with the numbers of bacteria recovered from tissue. Through whole body imaging for both lux and FLuc, bacteria and tumour cells were co-localised. 3D BLI and μCT image analysis revealed a pattern of multiple clusters of bacteria within tumours. Investigation of spatial resolution of 3D optical imaging was supported by ex vivo histological analyses. In vivo imaging of orally-administered commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was also achieved using 3D BLI. This study demonstrates for the first time the potential to simultaneously image multiple BLI reporter genes three dimensionally in vivo using approaches that provide unique information on spatial locations.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBacteriaCell Line, TumorFemaleGenes, ReporterGenetic EngineeringGlioblastomaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLuminescent MeasurementsLung NeoplasmsMiceMolecular ImagingX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID22295120
PMCPMC3266281
OpenAlexW1991161955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.