Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22294844›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Population-based study of DNA image cytometry as screening method for esophageal cancer.

Lin Zhao, Wen-Qiang Wei, De-Li Zhao, Chang-Qing Hao, Dong-Mei Lin, Qin-Jing Pan, Xin-Qing Li, Fu-Hua Lei, Jin-Wu Wang, Guo-Qing Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lin ZhaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute/Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Wen-Qiang Wei
De-Li Zhao
Chang-Qing Hao
Dong-Mei Lin
Qin-Jing Pan
Xin-Qing Li
Fu-Hua Lei
Jin-Wu Wang
Guo-Qing Wang
Qi Shang
You-Lin Qiao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the DNA image cytometry (DNA-ICM) technique as a primary screening method for esophageal squamous precancerous lesions.

methodsThis study was designed as a population-based screening study. A total of 582 local residents aged 40 years-69 years were recruited from Linzhou in Henan and Feicheng in Shandong. However, only 452 subjects had results of liquid-based cytology, DNA-ICM and pathology. The sensitivity and specificity of DNA-ICM were calculated and compared with liquid-based cytology in moderate dysplasia or worse.

resultsSensitivities of DNA-ICM ranging from at least 1 to 4 aneuploid cells were 90.91%, 86.36%, 79.55% and 77.27%, respectively, which were better than that of liquid-based cytology (75%). Specificities of DNA-ICM were 70.83%, 84.07%, 92.65% and 96.81%, but the specificity of liquid-based cytology was 91.91%. The sensitivity and specificity of a combination of liquid-based cytology and DNA-ICM were 84.09% and 85.78%, respectively.

conclusionIt is possible to use DNA-ICM technique as a primary screening method for esophageal squamous precancerous lesions.

Indexed as

DNAAdultAgedChinaCytodiagnosisEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage CytometryMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrecancerous ConditionsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityDNAAneuploidyDNA image cytometryEsophageal cancerPrecancerous lesionsScreening

Identifiers

PMID22294844
PMCPMC3261533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.