Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22294723›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Mechanisms of CHD5 Inactivation in neuroblastomas.

Hiroshi Koyama, Tiangang Zhuang, Jennifer E Light, Venkatadri Kolla, Mayumi Higashi, Patrick W McGrady, Wendy B London, Garrett M Brodeur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An overview of neuroblastoma cell lineage phenotypes andExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi KoyamaDivision of Oncology, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tiangang Zhuang
Jennifer E Light
Venkatadri Kolla
Mayumi Higashi
Patrick W McGrady
Wendy B London
Garrett M Brodeur
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · USChildren's Oncology Group · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF NEUROBLASTOMAR01CA039771 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODEUR, GARRETT M · 1985 to 2013
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039771NCI NIH HHS R01-CA39771NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA98413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuroblastomas (NBs) have genomic, biological, and clinical heterogeneity. High-risk NBs are characterized by several genomic changes, including MYCN amplification and 1p36 deletion. We identified the chromatin-remodeling gene CHD5 as a tumor suppressor gene that maps to 1p36.31. Low or absent CHD5 expression is associated with a 1p36 deletion and an unfavorable outcome, but the mechanisms of CHD5 inactivation in NBs are unknown. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe examined (i) the CHD5 sequence in 188 high-risk NBs investigated through the TARGET initiative, (ii) the methylation status of the CHD5 promoter in 108 NBs with or without 1p36 deletion and/or MYCN amplification, and (iii) mRNA expression of CHD5 and MYCN in 814 representative NBs using TaqMan low-density array microfluidic cards.

resultsWe found no examples of somatically acquired CHD5 mutations, even in cases with 1p36 deletion, indicating that homozygous genomic inactivation is rare. Methylation of the CHD5 promoter was common in the high-risk tumors, and it was generally associated with both 1p deletion and MYCN amplification. High CHD5 expression was a powerful predictor of favorable outcome, and it showed prognostic value even in multivariable analysis after adjusting for MYCN amplification, 1p36 deletion, and/or 11q deletion.

conclusionsWe conclude that (i) somatically acquired CHD5 mutations are rare in primary NBs, so inactivation probably occurs by deletion and epigenetic silencing; (ii) CHD5 expression and promoter methylation are associated with MYCN amplification, suggesting a possible interaction between these 2 genes; and (iii) high CHD5 expression is strongly correlated with favorable clinical/biological features and outcome.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, Pair 1DNA HelicasesDNA MethylationHumansInfantNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsRNA, MessengerSequence DeletionTransfectionCHD5 protein, humanDNA HelicasesMYCN protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22294723
PMCPMC3306487
OpenAlexW2149944967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.