Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22294562›Full record

ArticleMathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA2013

A computational model of bleb formation.

Wanda Strychalski, Robert D Guy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cytoplasmic crowding acts as a porous medium reducing macromolecule diffusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Modeling the dynamics of actin and myosin during bleb stabilization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Low Reynolds Number Swimming Near Interfaces in Multi-Fluid Media.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wanda StrychalskiDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. wanda@math.ucdavis.edu
Robert D Guy

Funding

STRUCTUREU54GM064346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI IMPERIALI, BARBARA · 2001 to 2010
$74.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM064346NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM64346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blebbing occurs when the cytoskeleton detaches from the cell membrane, resulting in the pressure-driven flow of cytosol towards the area of detachment and the local expansion of the cell membrane. Recent interest has focused on cells that use blebbing for migrating through 3D fibrous matrices. In particular, metastatic cancer cells have been shown to use blebs for motility. A dynamic computational model of the cell is presented that includes mechanics of and the interactions between the intracellular fluid, the actin cortex and the cell membrane. The computational model is used to explore the relative roles in bleb formation time of cytoplasmic viscosity and drag between the cortex and the cytosol. A regime of values for the drag coefficient and cytoplasmic viscosity values that match bleb formation timescales is presented. The model results are then used to predict the Darcy permeability and the volume fraction of the cortex.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MovementCell Surface ExtensionsCytoplasmElasticityIntracellular FluidLinear ModelsMathematical ConceptsPorosityViscosityActinsblebbingcell cortexcell mechanicsimmersed boundary methodintracellular fluid flowporous media

Identifiers

PMID22294562
PMCPMC4104658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.