Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22294294›Full record

ArticleCancer2012

Cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in Georgia: describing racial cancer disparities and potential geographic determinants.

Sara E Wagner, Deborah M Hurley, James R Hébert, Chrissy McNamara, A Rana Bayakly, John E Vena

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effective recruitment strategies and community-based participatory research: community networks program centers' recruitment in cancer prevention studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Oral Cancer Prognostic Disparities among Black Individuals: A Scoping Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara E WagnerCollege of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-7396, USA. swagner@uga.edu
Deborah M Hurley
James R Hébert
Chrissy McNamara
A Rana Bayakly
John E Vena
Georgia Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Georgia · USSouth Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
Expanding Mentoring Capacity in High-Risk PopulationsK05CA136975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$801k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA136975NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate racial cancer disparities in Georgia by calculating and comparing mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) by health district and in relation to geographic factors.

methodsData sources included cancer incidence (Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry), cancer mortality (Georgia Vital Records), and health factor (County Health Rankings) data. Age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates were calculated by cancer site (all sites combined, lung, colorectal, prostate, breast, oral, and cervical) for 2003-2007. MIRs and 95% confidence intervals were calculated overall and by district for each cancer site, race, and sex. MIRs were mapped by district and compared with geographic health factors.

resultsIn total, 186,419 incident cases and 71,533 deaths were identified. Blacks had higher MIRs than whites for every cancer site evaluated, and especially large differentials were observed for prostate, cervical, and oral cancer in men. Large geographic disparities were detected, with larger MIRs, chiefly among blacks, in Georgia compared with national data. The highest MIRs were detected in west and east central Georgia, and the lowest MIRs were detected in and around Atlanta. Districts with better health behavior, clinical care, and social/economic factors had lower MIRs, especially among whites.

conclusionsMore fatal cancers, particularly prostate, cervical, and oral cancer in men were detected among blacks, especially in central Georgia, where health behavior and social/economic factors were worse. MIRs are an efficient indicator of survival and provide insight into racial cancer disparities. Additional examination of geographic determinants of cancer fatality in Georgia as indicated by MIRs is warranted.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleEnvironmentEthnicityFemaleGeorgiaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceMaleNeoplasmsSocioeconomic FactorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID22294294
PMCPMC3342438
OpenAlexW2024269899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.