ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2012
Validity and reliability of the Horiba C-122 compact sodium analyzer in sweat samples of athletes.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-Exercise Rehydration in Athletes: Effects of Sodium and Carbohydrate in Commercial Hydration Beverages.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Reliability and validity of the MX3 portable sweat sodium analyser during exercise in warm conditions.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Physiological mechanisms determining eccrine sweat composition.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Review
- Physiology of sweat gland function: The roles of sweating and sweat composition in human health.Temperature (Austin, Tex.) · 2019Review
- Changes in milk composition associated with pethidine-PCEA usage after Caesarean section.Maternal & child nutrition · 2017Article
- Sweating Rate and Sweat Sodium Concentration in Athletes: A Review of Methodology and Intra/Interindividual Variability.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
- Validity and reliability of a field technique for sweat Na+ and K+ analysis during exercise in a hot-humid environment.Physiological reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate sodium replacement during prolonged exercise is possible when sweat rate and sweat sodium content are directly measured. Few athletes have access to sweat sodium content measurement, as the equipment needed to perform such analyzes is costly, laboratory-based or requires technical skills. Using 70 sweat samples collected in 24 athletes from 3 anatomical sites, this study determined the reliability [single-trial and inter-day (7 samples over 3 days)] and validity (instrument error) of a pocket-sized, easy-to-use and low cost sodium analyzer (Horiba C-122, Kyoto, Japan) against reference values of an ion chromatograph, the 883 Basic IC plus (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland). The Horiba C-122 showed high single-trial reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.997, a typical error of measurement (EM) of 1.77 mmol/L and a coefficient of variation (CV) of 3.73%. As expected, the reliability of the 883 Basic IC plus was superior to that of the Horiba C-122 (ICC: 0.999; typical EM: 0.70 mmol/L; CV: 1.52%). The Horiba’s C-122 inter-day reliability was high (ICC: 1.00; typical EM: 0.35 mmol/L). An ICC of 0.975 indicates there was a strong relationship between results provided by both analyzers. Compared with reference values, the Horiba C-122 demonstrated a mean bias of 1.71 mmol/L, a pure EM of 7.52 mmol/L and 68% limits of agreement ranging from -5.81 to 9.23 mmol/L. We propose that the Horiba C-122 is sufficiently reliable to be used under field conditions where some degree of imprecision is acceptable, but not for research purposes where high accuracy is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.