Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22294255›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2012

A phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab with or without bevacizumab as frontline therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. A Fox Chase extramural research study.

Efrat Dotan, Neal J Meropol, Barbara Burtness, Crystal S Denlinger, James Lee, David Mintzer, Fang Zhu, Karen Ruth, Holly Tuttle, Judi Sylvester and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00321100 (Phase II Study of the Combination of Cetuximab, Capecitabine, and Oxaliplatin With Out Without Bevacizumab as Initial Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00321100 phase2terminatednot on this map

Phase II Study of the Combination of Cetuximab, Capecitabine, and Oxaliplatin With Out Without Bevacizumab as Initial Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFox Chase Cancer CenterRan2006 to 2013Enrolled23ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsbevacizumab, cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Malignant ascites: pathophysiology and treatment.International journal of clinical oncology · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Efrat DotanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. efrat.dotan@fccc.edu
Neal J Meropol
Barbara Burtness
Crystal S Denlinger
James Lee
David Mintzer
Fang Zhu
Karen Ruth
Holly Tuttle
Judi Sylvester
Steven J Cohen
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USHematology Oncology Associates · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDual inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) demonstrated initial promise in clinical trials. This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

methodsPatients were randomized to receive capecitabine 850 mg/m2 PO twice daily for 14 days, oxaliplatin 130 mg/ m2 IV day 1, and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IV loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, and 15 with (arm A) or without (Arm B) bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg IV day 1 every 21 days. Tumor samples were collected and retrospectively analyzed for KRAS mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate, with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) as secondary objectives.

resultsTwenty-three patients (12 in arm A, 11 in arm B) were enrolled onto the study. Median follow-up was 25.9 months. Both treatments were well tolerated, with expected higher rates of grade 1/2 hypertension and bleeding in arm A. The overall response rate was 54% (36.4% in arm A and 72.7% in arm B). Median time to progression was 8.7 months in arm A and 14.4 months in arm B. The median survival was 18.0 months in arm A and 42.5 months in arm B. The study was prematurely terminated after other studies reported inferior outcomes with dual antibody therapy.

conclusionsAlthough terminated early, the study supports the detrimental effect of combining VEGF and EGFR inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCapecitabineCetuximabDeoxycytidineFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID22294255
PMCPMC3400721
OpenAlexW2061416514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.