ArticleImplementation science : IS2012
Implementing a stepped-care approach in primary care: results of a qualitative study.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ open quality · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review.Implementation science : IS · 2016Pooled it
- Interventions to improve therapeutic communications between Black and minority ethnic patients and professionals in psychiatric services: systematic review.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2015Pooled it
- A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes.Implementation science : IS · 2014Pooled it
- Acceptability and fidelity of a psychosocial intervention (PROACTIVE) for older adults with depression in a basic health unit in São Paulo, Brazil: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- How do care providers evaluate collaboration? - qualitative process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of collaborative and stepped care for patients with mental disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Trial
- Why aggregated data falls short: an exploratory survey study on barriers and facilitators in implementing the stepped care model for mental health in primary care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- When do health and social care practitioners consider digital healthcare to be 'good care' for people with co-occurring alcohol-use disorder and depression? a qualitative analysis of practitioners' accounts.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Adolescent psychiatric hospitalization: a naturalistic observational study of statistical and clinical outcomes and moderating factors.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Implementation research on the intervention mode of "Comorbidity-Co-causes-Joint-prevention" comprehensive demonstration district of depression and obesity among children and adolescents in Beijing: study protocol.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A stepped care approach to mental health in Singapore: challenges and opportunities.BMC global and public health · 2025Review
- Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Adapting Public Health and Health Services Interventions in Diverse, Real-World Settings: Documentation and Iterative Guidance of Adaptations.Annual review of public health · 2025Review
- Using normalisation process theory (NPT) to explore implementation of the maternal perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) policy in Uganda: a reflection.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Integrating stakeholder feedback into the design of a peer-delivered primary care wellness program: A rapid qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Change Process of a Brief Cognitive Behavior Therapy Workshop for Psychological Distress Among Primary Care Self-Referrals in Selangor, Malaysia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Digitalisation of municipal healthcare collaboration with volunteers: a case study applying normalization process theory.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2004, 'stepped-care models' have been adopted in several international evidence-based clinical guidelines to guide clinicians in the organisation of depression care. To enhance the adoption of this new treatment approach, a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) was initiated in the Netherlands.
methodsAlongside the QIC, an intervention study using a controlled before-and-after design was performed. Part of the study was a process evaluation, utilizing semi-structured group interviews, to provide insight into the perceptions of the participating clinicians on the implementation of stepped care for depression into their daily routines. Participants were primary care clinicians, specialist clinicians, and other healthcare staff from eight regions in the Netherlands. Analysis was supported by the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT).
resultsThe introduction of a stepped-care model for depression to primary care teams within the context of a depression QIC was generally well received by participating clinicians. All three elements of the proposed stepped-care model (patient differentiation, stepped-care treatment, and outcome monitoring), were translated and introduced locally. Clinicians reported changes in terms of learning how to differentiate between patient groups and different levels of care, changing antidepressant prescribing routines as a consequence of having a broader treatment package to offer to their patients, and better working relationships with patients and colleagues. A complex range of factors influenced the implementation process. Facilitating factors were the stepped-care model itself, the structured team meetings (part of the QIC method), and the positive reaction from patients to stepped care. The differing views of depression and depression care within multidisciplinary health teams, lack of resources, and poor information systems hindered the rapid introduction of the stepped-care model. The NPT constructs 'coherence' and 'cognitive participation' appeared to be crucial drivers in the initial stage of the process.
conclusionsStepped care for depression is received positively in primary care. While it is difficult for the implementation of a full stepped-care approach to occur within a short time frame, clinicians can make progress towards achieving a stepped-care approach, particularly within the context of a QIC. Creating a shared understanding within multidisciplinary teams of what constitutes depression, reaching a consensus about the content of depression care, and the division of tasks are important when addressing the implementation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.