Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22292986›Full record

SynthesisGenome biology2012

MetaMerge: scaling up genome-scale metabolic reconstructions with application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Leonid Chindelevitch, Sarah Stanley, Deborah Hung, Aviv Regev, Bonnie Berger

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genome biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  7. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Towards dynamic genome-scale models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Systems Biology Approaches to Understand Natural Products Biosynthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonid ChindelevitchDepartment of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Sarah Stanley
Deborah Hung
Aviv Regev
Bonnie Berger

Funding

The temporal reconfiguration of regulatory networks: From yeast to cancerDP1CA174427 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI REGEV, AVIV · 2012 to 2012
$839k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS DP1 CA174427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructed models of metabolic networks are widely used for studying metabolism in various organisms. Many different reconstructions of the same organism often exist concurrently, forcing researchers to choose one of them at the exclusion of the others. We describe MetaMerge, an algorithm for semi-automatically reconciling a pair of existing metabolic network reconstructions into a single metabolic network model. We use MetaMerge to combine two published metabolic networks for Mycobacterium tuberculosis into a single network, which allows many reactions that could not be active in the individual models to become active, and predicts essential genes with a higher positive predictive value.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialAlgorithmsComputational BiologyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalMycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID22292986
PMCPMC3488975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.