Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22292838›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2012

Risks worth taking: safety agreements among discordant gay couples.

Sean C Beougher, Deepalika Chakravarty, Carla C Garcia, Lynae A Darbes, Torsten B Neilands, Colleen C Hoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Contextualized Experiences and Predictors of Condom Use in a Flemish Population: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Condom-Related Stigma Scale among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Development and Psychometric Tests.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Condom stigma among men who have sex with men population: Concept synthesis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sean C BeougherCenter for Research on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA. seancb@sfsu.edu
Deepalika Chakravarty
Carla C Garcia
Lynae A Darbes
Torsten B Neilands
Colleen C Hoff
San Francisco State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · US

Funding

Continuation of Longitudinal Gay Couples StudyR01MH075598 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOFF, COLLEEN · 2006 to 2014
$5.2M
Testing a Model of HIV Risk for MenR01MH065141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOFF, COLLEEN · 2002 to 2006
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS MH65141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075598NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH75598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As HIV research and prevention efforts increasingly target gay men in relationships, situational factors such as couple serostatus and agreements about sex become central to examinations of risk. Discordant gay couples are of particular interest because the risk of HIV infection is seemingly near-at-hand. Yet, little is known about their sexual behaviors, agreements about sex, and safer sex efforts. The present study utilized longitudinal semi-structured, qualitative interviews to explore these issues among 12 discordant couples. Findings show that nearly every couple had agreements about reducing the likelihood of HIV transmission from one partner to the other. Negotiating these agreements involved establishing a level of acceptable risk, determining condom use, and employing other risk-reduction techniques, such as seropositioning and withdrawal. For half of the couples, these agreements did not involve using condoms; only two couples reported consistent condom use. Despite forgoing condoms, however, none reported seroconversion over the course of data collection. Additional issues are raised where long-term HIV prevention is concerned. Future prevention efforts with discordant couples should work with, rather than fight against, the couple's decision to use condoms and endeavor to complement and accentuate their other safer sex efforts.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorAdultAgedHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHomosexuality, MaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNegotiatingQualitative ResearchSafe Sex

Identifiers

PMID22292838
PMCPMC3342469
OpenAlexW2032224547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.