Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22292826›Full record

ReviewExpert review of proteomics2012

The scientific exploration of saliva in the post-proteomic era: from database back to basic function.

Stefan Ruhl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of proteomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Positive Role of Saliva in the Oral Microbiome.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Novel impacts of saliva with regard to oral health.The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterizing Microbiota from Sjögren's Syndrome Patients.JDR clinical and translational research · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan RuhlDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. shruhl@buffalo.edu

Funding

Microbial Recognition of Sialic Acid Diversity in the Salivary ProteomeR01DE019807 · NIDCR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI RUHL, STEFAN HANS-KLAUS · 2010 to 2022
$4.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5 R01 DE019807-02NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteome of human saliva can be considered as being essentially completed. Diagnostic markers for a number of diseases have been identified among salivary proteins and peptides, taking advantage of saliva as an easy-to-obtain biological fluid. Yet, the majority of disease markers identified so far are serum components and not intrinsic proteins produced by the salivary glands. Furthermore, despite the fact that saliva is essential for protecting the oral integuments and dentition, little progress has been made in finding risk predictors in the salivary proteome for dental caries or periodontal disease. Since salivary proteins, and in particular the attached glycans, play an important role in interactions with the microbial world, the salivary glycoproteome and other post-translational modifications of salivary proteins need to be studied. Risk markers for microbial diseases, including dental caries, are likely to be discovered among the highly glycosylated major protein species in saliva. This review will attempt to raise new ideas and also point to under-researched areas that may hold promise for future applicability in oral diagnostics and prediction of oral disease.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProteomicsDental CariesHumansSalivaSalivary Proteins and PeptidesSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID22292826
PMCPMC3289089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.