ReviewPaediatric drugs2012
Atazanavir: in pediatric patients with HIV-1 infection.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- PRINCE-1: safety and efficacy of atazanavir powder and ritonavir liquid in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naïve and -experienced infants and children aged ≥3 months to <6 years.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of Unboosted Atazanavir in Treatment-experienced HIV-infected Children, Adolescents and Young Adults.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atazanavir is a selective and potent inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease. The drug is administered in combination with low-dose ritonavir, to boost atazanavir pharmacokinetics (i.e. ritonavir-boosted atazanavir), and other antiretroviral agents. The efficacy of once-daily ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus background therapy (BT) in establishing virologic suppression in treatment-naive pediatric patients (aged 6 to <18 years) infected with HIV-1 was demonstrated in an ongoing, open-label, multicenter, phase I/II trial (PACTG 1020A). HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 or <400 copies/mL were achieved by the majority of patients (>70%) after 24 weeks' therapy, with these benefits maintained at week 48. Some treatment-experienced pediatric patients (aged 6 to <18 years) also achieved HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 or <400 copies/mL in the PACTG 1020A trial after 24 (≤45% of patients) and 48 (≤32%) weeks of treatment with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus BT, although the benefits of the regimen in this patient population appeared to be limited by as few as one or two protease inhibitor resistance mutations. Treatment-experienced pediatric patients (aged 10-19 years) infected with HIV-1 had mixed success in establishing/maintaining virologic suppression when they were switched from their current antiretroviral treatment regimen to once-daily ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus BT in a small, single-center, observational study. However, some patients may have received atazanavir at a suboptimal dosage or had suboptimal susceptibility to BT agents. In the PACTG 1020A trial, use of atazanavir (with or without ritonavir) in pediatric patients aged 6 to <18 years was associated with a similar safety profile to that reported in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.