ArticlePloS one2012
GSVD comparison of patient-matched normal and tumor aCGH profiles reveals global copy-number alterations predicting glioblastoma multiforme survival.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Targeted Therapies in Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Systematic Overview of Global Trends and Findings.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Retrospective clinical trial experimentally validates glioblastoma genome-wide pattern of DNA copy-number alterations predictor of survival.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
- Data Fusion Techniques for the Integration of Multi-Domain Genomic Data from Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2019Article
- Copy number profiling across glioblastoma populations has implications for clinical trial design.Neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Mathematically universal and biologically consistent astrocytoma genotype encodes for transformation and predicts survival phenotype.APL bioengineering · 2018Article
- Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene-disease predictions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Structure-revealing data fusion.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Multi-tissue analysis of co-expression networks by higher-order generalized singular value decomposition identifies functionally coherent transcriptional modules.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Subclassification of newly diagnosed glioblastomas through an immunohistochemical approach.PloS one · 2014Article
- Interpretation, stratification and evidence for sequence variants affecting mRNA splicing in complete human genome sequences.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Article
- Epigenetic control and cancer: the potential of histone demethylases as therapeutic targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Genome-wide gene amplification during differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro.PloS one · 2012Article
- The Tousled-Like Kinases as Guardians of Genome Integrity.ISRN molecular biology · 2012Article
- Radiogenomic modeling predicts survival-associated prognostic groups in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Functional Module Analysis for Gene Coexpression Networks with Network Integration.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent large-scale profiling efforts, the best prognostic predictor of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains the patient's age at diagnosis. We describe a global pattern of tumor-exclusive co-occurring copy-number alterations (CNAs) that is correlated, possibly coordinated with GBM patients' survival and response to chemotherapy. The pattern is revealed by GSVD comparison of patient-matched but probe-independent GBM and normal aCGH datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We find that, first, the GSVD, formulated as a framework for comparatively modeling two composite datasets, removes from the pattern copy-number variations (CNVs) that occur in the normal human genome (e.g., female-specific X chromosome amplification) and experimental variations (e.g., in tissue batch, genomic center, hybridization date and scanner), without a-priori knowledge of these variations. Second, the pattern includes most known GBM-associated changes in chromosome numbers and focal CNAs, as well as several previously unreported CNAs in >3% of the patients. These include the biochemically putative drug target, cell cycle-regulated serine/threonine kinase-encoding TLK2, the cyclin E1-encoding CCNE1, and the Rb-binding histone demethylase-encoding KDM5A. Third, the pattern provides a better prognostic predictor than the chromosome numbers or any one focal CNA that it identifies, suggesting that the GBM survival phenotype is an outcome of its global genotype. The pattern is independent of age, and combined with age, makes a better predictor than age alone. GSVD comparison of matched profiles of a larger set of TCGA patients, inclusive of the initial set, confirms the global pattern. GSVD classification of the GBM profiles of an independent set of patients validates the prognostic contribution of the pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.