ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2011
BAX pro-apoptotic gene alterations in repeated pregnancy loss.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review to guide future efforts in the determination of genetic causes of pregnancy loss.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2021Article
- Genetic Variants Contributing to Early Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Etiology Identified by Sequencing Approaches.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2020Review
- Increased apoptosis rate of human decidual cells and cytotrophoblasts in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion as a result of abnormal expression of CDKN1A and Bax.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Pathogenic activity of circulating anti-desmoglein-3 autoantibodies isolated from pemphigus vulgaris patients.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2012Article
- A Review on Various Uses of N-Acetyl Cysteine.Cell journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a critical medical problem in about 0.5-2% of women. The molecular genetic background for spontaneous abortion is being increasingly understood, and some polymorphisms associated with it have been reported. This study investigates alterations of the Bax gene as a pro-apoptotic gene in women with idiopathic RPL. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe frequency of mutations in the Bax gene of 67 idiopathic RPL women was studied in comparison to a sample of 70 healthy women. The promoter and the entire coding regions (exons 1-7) were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The purity of the PCR product was first verified by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. The amplified fragment was then sequenced by automated DNA sequencing.
resultsA statistically significant difference was observed between patients and the control group regarding the frequency of alleles A(-179)G in the Bax promoter region (p= 0.013). Also among patients, G90C and G95A transitions were found in the coding region of exon 1 that change amino acid glutamine (Q) to histidine (H) and arginine (R) to lysine (K), respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between H allele (p = 0.0001) and K allele (p< 0.0001) and the occurrence of RPL.
conclusionsOur results indicate an association between A(-179)G mutation in the Bax promoter and RPL. Moreover, two polymorphisms, G90C and G95A in exon 1, found among our patients, could be considered as genetic factors making people susceptible to miscarriages. According to our findings, the Bax gene has an important role in pregnancy loss and the variations of this gene could help in the assessment of RPL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.