Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22291600›Full record

ReviewPLoS genetics2012

Tempo and mode in evolution of transcriptional regulation.

Kacy L Gordon, Ilya Ruvinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-read genome assemblies reveal aZoological research · 2023
    Article
  8. Modular Evolution of the Drosophila Metabolome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CompensatoryEvolution letters · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Gene Regulation and Speciation.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kacy L GordonDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ilya Ruvinsky

Funding

CORE: ADMINISTRATIVEP50GM081892 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2008 to 2013
$15.9M
Training Program in Developmental BiologyT32HD055164 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Sally Horne-Badovinac, Paschalis Kratsios · 2008 to 2026
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 T32 HD055164NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055164NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perennial questions of evolutionary biology can be applied to gene regulatory systems using the abundance of experimental data addressing gene regulation in a comparative context. What is the tempo (frequency, rate) and mode (way, mechanism) of transcriptional regulatory evolution? Here we synthesize the results of 230 experiments performed on insects and nematodes in which regulatory DNA from one species was used to drive gene expression in another species. General principles of regulatory evolution emerge. Gene regulatory evolution is widespread and accumulates with genetic divergence in both insects and nematodes. Divergence in cis is more common than divergence in trans. Coevolution between cis and trans shows a particular increase over greater evolutionary timespans, especially in sex-specific gene regulation. Despite these generalities, the evolution of gene regulation is gene- and taxon-specific. The congruence of these conclusions with evidence from other types of experiments suggests that general principles are discoverable, and a unified view of the tempo and mode of regulatory evolution may be achievable.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterEnhancer Elements, GeneticPhylogenyPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22291600
PMCPMC3261924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.