Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22290955›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Species-specific antifungal susceptibility patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria species.

Michaela Lackner, G Sybren de Hoog, Paul E Verweij, Mohammad J Najafzadeh, Ilse Curfs-Breuker, Corné H Klaassen, Jacques F Meis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Amphotericin B Resistance inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Challenges ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical characterization of immunocompetent patients withRespiratory medicine case reports · 2025
    Article
  15. Case report: co-infection ofAME case reports · 2025
    Article
  16. First Report ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  17. Current medical mycology · 2025
    Article
  18. The Brief Case: Hidden in plain sight-Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Michaela LacknerFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Biosafety Laboratory, Bonn, Germany.
G Sybren de Hoog
Paul E Verweij
Mohammad J Najafzadeh
Ilse Curfs-Breuker
Corné H Klaassen
Jacques F Meis
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DEGhaem Hospital · IRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the separation of Pseudallescheria boydii and P. apiosperma in 2010, limited data on species-specific susceptibility patterns of these and other species of Pseudallescheria and its anamorph Scedosporium have been reported. This study presents the antifungal susceptibility patterns of members affiliated with both entities. Clinical and environmental isolates (n = 332) from a wide range of sources and origins were identified down to species level and tested according to CLSI M38-A2 against eight antifungal compounds. Whereas P. apiosperma (geometric mean MIC/minimal effective concentration [MEC] values of 0.9, 2.4, 7.4, 16.2, 0.2, 0.8, 1.5, and 6.8 μg/ml for voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and amphotericin B, respectively) and P. boydii (geometric mean MIC/MEC values of 0.7, 1.3, 5.7, 13.8, 0.5, 1.4, 2.3, and 11.8 μg/ml for voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and amphotericin B, respectively) had similar susceptibility patterns, those for S. aurantiacum, S. prolificans, and S. dehoogii were different from each other. Voriconazole was the only drug with significant activity against S. aurantiacum isolates. The MIC distributions of all drugs except voriconazole did not show a normal distribution and often showed two subpopulations, making a species-based prediction of antifungal susceptibility difficult. Therefore, antifungal susceptibility testing of all clinical isolates remains essential for targeted antifungal therapy. Voriconazole was the only compound with low MIC values (MIC(90) of ≤ 2 μg/ml) for P. apiosperma and P. boydii. Micafungin and posaconazole showed moderate activity against the majority of Scedosporium strains.

Indexed as

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisAntifungal AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsHumansLipopeptidesMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudallescheriaPyrimidinesScedosporiumSpecies SpecificityTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID22290955
PMCPMC3346635
OpenAlexW2151043417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.