Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22290952›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

In vitro and in vivo activities of posaconazole and amphotericin B in a murine invasive infection by Mucor circinelloides: poor efficacy of posaconazole.

Valentina Salas, F Javier Pastor, Enrique Calvo, Eduardo Alvarez, Deanna A Sutton, Emilio Mayayo, Anette W Fothergill, Michael G Rinaldi, Josep Guarro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic Challenges of Non-Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Animal Models to Study Mucormycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. David and Goliath: chemical perturbation of eukaryotes by bacteria.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2016
    Review
  19. A rare cause of ischemic gut: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina SalasUnitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain.
F Javier Pastor
Enrique Calvo
Eduardo Alvarez
Deanna A Sutton
Emilio Mayayo
Anette W Fothergill
Michael G Rinaldi
Josep Guarro
Universidad Rovira i Virgili · ESThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibility of 17 strains of Mucor circinelloides to amphotericin B and posaconazole was ascertained by using broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods and by determining the minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC). We evaluated the efficacy of posaconazole at 40 mg/kg of body weight/day and amphotericin B at 0.8 mg/kg/day in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated infection by M. circinelloides by using 6 different strains tested previously in vitro. In general, most of the posaconazole MICs were within the range of susceptibility or intermediate susceptibility, while the small inhibition zone diameters (IZDs) were indicative of nonsusceptibility for all isolates tested. The MFCs were ≥ 3 dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs. In contrast, amphotericin B showed good activity against all of the strains tested regardless of the method used. The in vivo studies demonstrated that amphotericin B was effective in prolonging survival and reducing the fungal load. Posaconazole showed poor in vivo efficacy with no correlation with the MIC values. The results suggested that posaconazole should be used with caution in the treatment of infections caused by Mucor circinelloides or by strains of Mucor not identified to the species level.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBrainDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, FungalKidneyMaleMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMucorMucormycosisNeutropeniaSpecies SpecificitySurvival RateTreatment FailureAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22290952
PMCPMC3346623
OpenAlexW2170378278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.