ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2012
Sensor-based cell and tissue screening for personalized cancer chemotherapy.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Culture of vibrating microtome tissue slices as a 3D model in biomedical research.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Estimation of dynamic metabolic activity in micro-tissue cultures from sensor recordings with an FEM model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016Article
- Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.ALTEX · 2016Review
- Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015Review
- Chemo-predictive assay for targeting cancer stem-like cells in patients affected by brain tumors.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized tumor chemotherapy depends on reliable assay methods, either based on molecular "predictive biomarkers" or on a direct, functional ex vivo assessment of cellular chemosensitivity. As a member of the latter category, a novel high-content platform is described monitoring human mamma carcinoma explants in real time and label-free before, during and after an ex vivo modeled chemotherapy. Tissue explants are sliced with a vibratome and laid into the microreaction chambers of a 24-well sensor test plate. Within these ~23 μl volume chambers, sensors for pH and dissolved oxygen record rates of cellular oxygen uptake and extracellular acidification. Robot-controlled fluid system and incubation are parts of the tissue culture maintenance system while an integrated microscope is used for process surveillance. Sliced surgical explants from breast cancerous tissue generate well-detectable ex vivo metabolic activity. Metabolic rates, in particular oxygen consumption rates have a tendency to decrease over time. Nonetheless, the impact of added drugs (doxorubicin, chloroacetaldehyde) is discriminable. Sensor-based platforms should be evaluated in explorative clinical studies for their suitability to support targeted systemic cancer therapy. Throughput is sufficient for testing various drugs in a range of concentrations while the information content obtained from multiparametric real-time analysis is superior to conventional endpoint assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.