Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22290264›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

Studying a complex tumor: potential and pitfalls.

Siyuan Zheng, Milan G Chheda, Roel G W Verhaak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances in Research of Adult Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siyuan ZhengDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Milan G Chheda
Roel G W Verhaak
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Integrative Pipeline for Analysis & Translational Application of TCGA Data (GDAC)U24CA143883 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AKBANI, REHAN, MILLS, GORDON B. · 2009 to 2016
$10.6M
Characterization of GEFT AS a Novel Glioblastoma OncogeneK08NS062907 · NINDS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHHEDA, MILAN GIRISH · 2009 to 2014
$890k
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143883NCI NIH HHS U24CA143883NINDS NIH HHS 5K08NS062907NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS062907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme is a histopathologically heterogeneous disease with few treatment options. Therapy based on genomic alterations is rapidly gaining popularity because of the high response rate and high specificity. DNA copy number and exon-sequencing studies of glioblastoma multiforme samples have revealed recurrent genomic alterations in genes such as TP53, EGFR, and IDH1, but to date, this has not resulted in novel glioblastoma multiforme therapies. Identification of expression subtypes has resulted in new insights such as the association between genomic abnormalities and expression signatures. This review describes the types of genomic studies that have been performed and that are underway, the most prominent results, and the implications of genomic research for the development of clinical treatment modalities.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGenetic TherapyGenomicsGlioblastomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID22290264
PMCPMC3342695
OpenAlexW1972096375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.